0x99681dd2654a821ea2c40e83f9cf6e6b6255e508
0x99681dd2654a821ea2c40e83f9cf6e6b6255e508
Activity score
74/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$10.00
Total PnL
$0.05
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYUS Sassuolo Calcio vs. AC Milan: O/U 11.5 Total Corners$5.0052m ago
- REDEEMWill Red Bull get pole position at the 2026 F1 Miami Grand Prix?$5.001h ago
- TRADEBUYGame 3: Ends in Daytime?$4.953h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Red Bull get pole position at the 2026 F1 Miami Grand Prix?$5.004h ago
- REDEEMTotal Kills Over/Under 43.5 in Game 2?$5.0015d ago
- REDEEMTotal Kills Over/Under 23.5 in Game 2?$4.9915d ago
- REDEEMGateshead FC vs. Woking FC: Both Teams to Score$0.0015d ago
- REDEEMGateshead FC vs. Woking FC: Both Teams to Score$0.0015d ago
- REDEEMGateshead FC vs. Woking FC: Both Teams to Score$5.0015d ago
- REDEEMTSG 1899 Hoffenheim vs. BV Borussia 09 Dortmund: O/U 10.5 Total Corners$0.0015d ago
- REDEEMTSG 1899 Hoffenheim vs. BV Borussia 09 Dortmund: O/U 10.5 Total Corners$5.0015d ago
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 23.5 in Game 2?$4.9915d ago
- TRADEBUYGateshead FC vs. Woking FC: Both Teams to Score$5.0015d ago
- TRADEBUYTSG 1899 Hoffenheim vs. BV Borussia 09 Dortmund: O/U 10.5 Total Corners$5.0015d ago
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 43.5 in Game 2?$5.0015d ago
- REDEEMPakistan Super League: Lahore Qalandars vs Quetta Gladiators - Team Top Batter Lahore Qalandars Winner$5.0016d ago
- REDEEMSet 1 Winner: Silva vs Dias$0.0016d ago
- REDEEMSet 1 Winner: Silva vs Dias$5.0016d ago
- TRADEBUYPakistan Super League: Lahore Qalandars vs Quetta Gladiators - Team Top Batter Lahore Qalandars Winner$5.0016d ago
- TRADEBUYSet 1 Winner: Silva vs Dias$5.0016d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 21
- Avg trade size
- $4.77
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 22d ago
- Last active
- 52m ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".