Selfish-Turn
0x9a2ea4e4d4743405f365d1d39b59f662a6365899
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
10
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-1.0K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Will BNB hit $1500 by December 31?
709 shares @ 26.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2026$0.00
$-184.45
- YES
Tottenham vs. Chelsea: Both Teams to Score
350 shares @ 62.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 1, 2025$0.00
$-219.30
- YES
Will Manchester United win on 2025-11-08?
250 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 8, 2025$0.00
$-100.00
- NO
Fight to Go the Distance?
230 shares @ 61.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 16, 2025$0.00
$-140.00
- NO
Fight to Go the Distance?
200 shares @ 31.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 7, 2025$0.00
$-62.00
- YES
Manchester City vs. Liverpool: Both Teams to Score
190 shares @ 58.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 9, 2025$0.00
$-110.90
- UP
Solana Up or Down on November 1?
170 shares @ 33.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 1, 2025$0.00
$-56.10
- YES
Will Manchester United win on 2025-11-01?
150 shares @ 47.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 1, 2025$0.00
$-70.50
- OVER
Manchester City vs. Liverpool: O/U 3.5
120 shares @ 25.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 9, 2025$0.00
$-30.00
- NO
Bitcoin above $105,000 on January 31?
75 shares @ 67.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2025$0.00
$-50.32
Recent activity
- TRADESELLWill Loopscale launch a token by September 30, 2026?$133.21Jan 30, 04:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Loopscale launch a token by September 30, 2026?$0.46Jan 23, 19:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Loopscale launch a token by September 30, 2026?$11.59Jan 23, 19:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Loopscale launch a token by September 30, 2026?$9.33Jan 23, 19:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Loopscale launch a token by September 30, 2026?$2.88Jan 23, 16:05 UTC
- TRADESELLZama FDV above $600M one day after launch?$65.71Jan 23, 02:58 UTC
- TRADESELLZama FDV above $600M one day after launch?$93.60Jan 23, 02:58 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Loopscale launch a token by September 30, 2026?$136.99Jan 22, 17:12 UTC
- REDEEMOver $90M committed to the Ranger public sale?$260.00Jan 10, 23:36 UTC
- REDEEMOver $120M committed to the Ranger public sale?$550.00Jan 10, 23:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYOver $90M committed to the Ranger public sale?$53.52Jan 10, 15:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYOver $90M committed to the Ranger public sale?$123.28Jan 10, 15:56 UTC
- TRADESELLOver $120M committed to the Ranger public sale?$412.50Jan 10, 05:49 UTC
- TRADESELLZama FDV above $600M one day after launch?$1.00Jan 10, 03:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Loopscale launch a token by September 30, 2026?$22.49Jan 10, 02:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Loopscale launch a token by September 30, 2026?$85.58Jan 10, 02:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYOver $120M committed to the Ranger public sale?$809.24Jan 8, 17:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYOver $120M committed to the Ranger public sale?$92.76Jan 8, 17:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYZama FDV above $600M one day after launch?$160.00Jan 7, 10:19 UTC
- TRADESELLOver $20M committed to the Ranger public sale?$810.41Jan 6, 16:14 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 48
- Avg trade size
- $100.40
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 9, 18:21 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 30, 04:48 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".