Untimely-Insight
0x9a3c15d740f6536d5f6a4e372af33883ea31573f
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
8
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-20.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Will the highest temperature in Denver be between 82-83°F on March 29?
10000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 29, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- PELICANS
Pelicans vs. Timberwolves
9 shares @ 11.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 29, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
- SUNS
Suns vs. Clippers
9 shares @ 22.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 25, 2025$0.00
$-2.00
- MAGIC
Hawks vs. Magic
3 shares @ 65.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 24, 2025$0.00
$-2.00
- ROCKETS
Pistons vs. Rockets
3 shares @ 70.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 25, 2025$0.00
$-2.00
- WARRIORS
Warriors vs. Trail Blazers
2 shares @ 54.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 25, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
- CAVALIERS
Cavaliers vs. Suns
1 shares @ 75.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 29, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
- PISTONS
Pistons vs. Mavericks
1 shares @ 78.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 29, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in Denver be between 82-83°F on March 29?$0.69Mar 30, 12:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in Denver be between 82-83°F on March 29?$0.66Mar 30, 12:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in Denver be between 82-83°F on March 29?$0.69Mar 30, 12:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in Denver be between 82-83°F on March 29?$3.33Mar 30, 12:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in Denver be between 82-83°F on March 29?$0.61Mar 30, 12:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in Denver be between 82-83°F on March 29?$1.25Mar 30, 12:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in Denver be between 82-83°F on March 29?$2.78Mar 30, 12:25 UTC
- REDEEMSpurs vs. Pelicans$1.61Mar 28, 09:00 UTC
- REDEEMCavaliers vs. Nets$2.33Mar 28, 09:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYSuns vs. Clippers$2.00Oct 24, 17:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWarriors vs. Trail Blazers$1.00Oct 24, 17:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYPistons vs. Rockets$2.00Oct 24, 17:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpurs vs. Pelicans$1.00Oct 24, 17:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYCavaliers vs. Nets$2.00Oct 24, 17:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYHawks vs. Magic$1.00Oct 24, 17:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYHawks vs. Magic$1.00Oct 24, 17:17 UTC
- REDEEMCeltics vs. Jazz$1.14Oct 24, 17:15 UTC
- REDEEMMagic vs. Wizards$1.33Oct 24, 17:15 UTC
- REDEEMGrizzlies vs. Clippers$1.43Oct 24, 17:15 UTC
- REDEEM76ers vs. Spurs$1.47Oct 24, 17:15 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Wallet edge sanity
Do not mirror
0/100Treat this wallet as noise/context only until resolved history, copy-risk, and liquidity checks improve.
Win rate is hidden until at least 3 closed markets exist for this wallet.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
Only 0 closed markets; headline win rate is intentionally hidden.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Blocked
14/100Wallet flow is blocked as an intelligence signal until hard failures are fixed.
32 live trades, 0 ledger trades, copy-risk 43/100.
Too few closed markets. Do not infer edge from open PnL or leaderboard rank.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 32
- Avg trade size
- $1.22
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 19, 17:56 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 30, 12:25 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.