Favorable-Neuron
0x9a8c93d5f11dc64b4ceef882f151a54c7079ba13
Activity score
75/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
8
Open notional
$17.6K
Total PnL
$-35.4K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- LUCKNOW SUPER GIANTS
Indian Premier League: Mumbai Indians vs Lucknow Super Giants
18120 shares @ 76.9¢·now 74.5¢·exp May 11, 2026$13.5K
$-429.07
- CHRISTOPHER OCONNELL
Internazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Martin Landaluce vs Christopher O'Connell
25071 shares @ 37.9¢·now 16.5¢·exp May 11, 2026$4.1K
$-5.4K
- NATUS VINCERE
Counter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs Vitality (BO5) - BLAST Rivals Playoffs
22500 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 3, 2026$0.00
$-9.0K
- TWINS
Twins vs. Marlins
14404 shares @ 57.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 8, 2025$0.00
$-8.2K
- MOCHIZUKI
Wimbledon: Mochizuki vs. Khachanov
8454 shares @ 31.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 2, 2025$0.00
$-2.7K
- GIANTS
Giants vs. Diamondbacks
7516 shares @ 69.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 9, 2025$0.00
$-5.2K
- NO
Will there be a run scored in the first inning?: Arizona Diamondbacks vs. Chicago Cubs
4995 shares @ 61.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 8, 2026$0.00
$-3.1K
- CARDINALS
Cardinals vs. Pirates
2178 shares @ 62.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 9, 2025$0.00
$-1.4K
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYIndian Premier League: Mumbai Indians vs Lucknow Super Giants$14.0K5m ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Martin Landaluce vs Christopher O'Connell$1.9K2h ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Martin Landaluce vs Christopher O'Connell$1.9K2h ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Martin Landaluce vs Christopher O'Connell$1.9K2h ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Martin Landaluce vs Christopher O'Connell$5.712h ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Martin Landaluce vs Christopher O'Connell$190.002h ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Martin Landaluce vs Christopher O'Connell$1.9K2h ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Martin Landaluce vs Christopher O'Connell$1.422h ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Martin Landaluce vs Christopher O'Connell$85.813h ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Martin Landaluce vs Christopher O'Connell$19.993h ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Martin Landaluce vs Christopher O'Connell$38.003h ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Martin Landaluce vs Christopher O'Connell$11.403h ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Martin Landaluce vs Christopher O'Connell$119.393h ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Martin Landaluce vs Christopher O'Connell$0.613h ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Martin Landaluce vs Christopher O'Connell$8.363h ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Martin Landaluce vs Christopher O'Connell$19.603h ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Martin Landaluce vs Christopher O'Connell$8.463h ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Martin Landaluce vs Christopher O'Connell$11.403h ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Martin Landaluce vs Christopher O'Connell$0.393h ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Martin Landaluce vs Christopher O'Connell$7.173h ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 47
- Avg trade size
- $863.36
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 21h ago
- Last active
- 5m ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".