0x9c9e1ce9330f6c924d30ca8f12952a427cd10ecf
0x9c9e1ce9330f6c924d30ca8f12952a427cd10ecf
Wallet digest
Activity score
69/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
72
Open notional
$80.68
Total PnL
$-26.08
Realised
$18.99
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 72- NO
Will Al Hilal Saudi Club win on 2026-01-29?
21 shares @ 52.5¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jan 29, 2026$20.94
$9.95
- NO
Will FC Bayern München win on 2026-01-24?
20 shares @ 5.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jan 24, 2026$19.99
$18.99
- NO
Will RC Celta de Vigo win on 2026-01-29?
16 shares @ 67.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jan 29, 2026$16.40
$5.41
- NETS
Nets vs. Jazz
10 shares @ 48.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$10.42
$5.42
- OVER
Al Okhdood SC vs. Al Riyadh Saudi Club: O/U 2.5
2 shares @ 51.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jan 21, 2026$1.96
$0.96
- UNDER
East Tennessee State Buccaneers vs. Chattanooga Mocs: O/U 145.5
2 shares @ 51.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jan 22, 2026$1.96
$0.96
- CAVALIERS
Spread: Cavaliers (-2.5)
2 shares @ 52.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jan 22, 2026$1.92
$0.92
- TEAM NEMESIS
Counter-Strike: EYEBALLERS vs Team Nemesis - Map 1 Winner
2 shares @ 58.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jan 21, 2026$1.72
$0.72
- OVER
Al Okhdood SC vs. Al Riyadh Saudi Club: O/U 1.5
2 shares @ 58.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jan 21, 2026$1.72
$0.72
- FAKE DO BIRU
Counter-Strike: Fake do Biru vs Yawara Esports (BO3) - Circuit X Betboom Redemption Curitiba Group A
1 shares @ 79.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jan 21, 2026$1.27
$0.27
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYNets vs. Jazz$5.00Jan 30, 14:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYAustralian Open Men's: Novak Djokovic vs Jannik Sinner$5.50Jan 30, 14:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill RC Celta de Vigo win on 2026-01-29?$5.49Jan 29, 19:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill RC Celta de Vigo win on 2026-01-29?$5.49Jan 29, 19:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYThunder vs. Timberwolves: O/U 225.5$5.50Jan 29, 19:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYHornets vs. Mavericks$1.81Jan 29, 18:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYRockets vs. Hawks$5.50Jan 29, 18:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYRockets vs. Hawks$5.50Jan 29, 18:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Al Hilal Saudi Club win on 2026-01-29?$5.50Jan 29, 17:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Al Hilal Saudi Club win on 2026-01-29?$5.50Jan 29, 17:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: AM Gaming vs Eternal Fire (BO3) - NODWIN Clutch Series Group Stage$0.99Jan 26, 13:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: AM Gaming vs Eternal Fire (BO3) - NODWIN Clutch Series Group Stage$0.99Jan 26, 13:43 UTC
- REDEEMAFC Bournemouth vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 4.5$0.00Jan 26, 11:56 UTC
- REDEEMWill FC Bayern München win on 2026-01-24?$0.00Jan 26, 11:55 UTC
- REDEEMAFC Bournemouth vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 4.5$6.25Jan 26, 11:40 UTC
- REDEEMWill FC Bayern München win on 2026-01-24?$0.00Jan 26, 11:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYUNCW Seahawks vs. Hampton Pirates$0.23Jan 24, 18:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYUNCW Seahawks vs. Hampton Pirates$0.26Jan 24, 18:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYUNCW Seahawks vs. Hampton Pirates$0.26Jan 24, 18:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYUNCW Seahawks vs. Hampton Pirates$0.26Jan 24, 18:17 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 46
- Avg trade size
- $1.51
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 24, 15:49 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 30, 14:37 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".