Idolized-Acquaintance
0x9e161cf45572279b5dad0e03b3eece250c84a795
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
76
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-127.4K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 76- YES
Will Sport Lisboa e Benfica win on 2026-02-01?
16071 shares @ 76.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 1, 2026$0.00
$-12.3K
- UNDER
Club Atlético de Madrid vs. Club Brugge KV: O/U 4.5
13314 shares @ 75.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 24, 2026$0.00
$-10.0K
- NO
Will Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-03-19?
10997 shares @ 64.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 19, 2026$0.00
$-7.0K
- NEWCASTLE UNITED FC
Spread: FC Barcelona (-1.5)
9202 shares @ 62.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 18, 2026$0.00
$-5.7K
- NO
Will San Jose Earthquakes win on 2026-03-21?
8633 shares @ 83.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 22, 2026$0.00
$-7.2K
- UNDER
FC Bayern München vs. Real Madrid CF: O/U 4.5
6984 shares @ 60.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 15, 2026$0.00
$-4.2K
- NO
Will Wolverhampton Wanderers FC win on 2026-02-27?
6641 shares @ 79.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 27, 2026$0.00
$-5.2K
- NO
Will FC Porto win on 2026-03-12?
6561 shares @ 76.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 12, 2026$0.00
$-5.0K
- NO
Will Sunderland AFC win on 2026-03-22?
6128 shares @ 83.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 22, 2026$0.00
$-5.1K
- NO
Will FC Internazionale Milano win on 2026-04-12?
6066 shares @ 61.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 12, 2026$0.00
$-3.7K
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYReal Betis Balompié vs. Elche CF: O/U 2.5$1.5KMay 12, 18:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Bayern München vs. Real Madrid CF: O/U 4.5$4.2KApr 15, 06:34 UTC
- REDEEMClub Atlético de Madrid vs. FC Barcelona: O/U 4.5$4.2KApr 15, 06:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYClub Atlético de Madrid vs. FC Barcelona: O/U 4.5$3.0KApr 14, 16:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Internazionale Milano win on 2026-04-12?$3.7KApr 12, 16:53 UTC
- REDEEMWill FC Nantes win on 2026-04-11?$3.7KApr 12, 16:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Nantes win on 2026-04-11?$3.0KApr 11, 16:58 UTC
- REDEEMWill Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-04-09?$8.0KApr 10, 22:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-04-09?$6.1KApr 9, 16:54 UTC
- REDEEMFC Barcelona vs. Club Atlético de Madrid: O/U 4.5$6.1KApr 9, 16:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Barcelona vs. Club Atlético de Madrid: O/U 4.5$4.4KApr 8, 15:43 UTC
- REDEEMReal Madrid CF vs. FC Bayern München: O/U 4.5$4.4KApr 8, 15:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYReal Madrid CF vs. FC Bayern München: O/U 4.5$3.0KApr 7, 17:44 UTC
- REDEEMACF Fiorentina vs. FC Internazionale Milano: O/U 3.5$9.5KMar 27, 05:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYACF Fiorentina vs. FC Internazionale Milano: O/U 3.5$6.5KMar 22, 19:13 UTC
- TRADESELLAS Roma vs. US Lecce: O/U 3.5$6.5KMar 22, 19:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYAS Roma vs. US Lecce: O/U 3.5$5.1KMar 22, 16:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Sunderland AFC win on 2026-03-22?$5.1KMar 22, 09:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill San Jose Earthquakes win on 2026-03-21?$7.2KMar 22, 02:14 UTC
- REDEEMWill Burnley FC win on 2026-03-21?$7.2KMar 22, 02:11 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 39
- Avg trade size
- $6.8K
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 15, 11:58 UTC
- Last active
- May 12, 18:05 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".