Insubstantial-Ability
0x9e193f4edf35d0e51f0762404889f3120a5c1495
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
30
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-10.1K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 30- OVER
VfL Wolfsburg vs. FC Bayern München: O/U 2.5
2500 shares @ 45.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 9, 2026$0.00
$-1.1K
- YES
Will AS Monaco FC win on 2026-04-19?
1600 shares @ 62.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 19, 2026$0.00
$-992.25
- YES
Will Sport Lisboa e Benfica win on 2026-04-06?
1500 shares @ 73.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 6, 2026$0.00
$-1.1K
- OILERS
Oilers vs. Ducks
1200 shares @ 55.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 1, 2026$0.00
$-660.00
- OVER
Udinese Calcio vs. Como 1907: O/U 1.5
1098 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 6, 2026$0.00
$-527.64
- OVER
SSC Napoli vs. AC Milan: O/U 1.5
1000 shares @ 60.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 6, 2026$0.00
$-600.00
- OVER
Rayo Vallecano de Madrid vs. RC Strasbourg Alsace: O/U 1.5
1000 shares @ 41.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$0.00
$-410.00
- OVER
Nottingham Forest FC vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 1.5
1000 shares @ 42.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$0.00
$-425.00
- YES
Will FK Krasnodar win on 2026-04-19?
758 shares @ 64.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 19, 2026$0.00
$-490.10
- YES
Will FC Porto win on 2026-04-09?
629 shares @ 44.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 9, 2026$0.00
$-276.67
Recent activity
- TRADESELLMiguel Díaz-Canel out as leader of Cuba by June 30?$13.70May 28, 06:59 UTC
- REDEEMTottenham Hotspur FC vs. Leeds United FC: Both Teams to Score$85.92May 12, 06:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYTottenham Hotspur FC vs. Leeds United FC: Both Teams to Score$48.75May 11, 18:37 UTC
- MAKER_REBATE$3.78May 10, 00:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYVfL Wolfsburg vs. FC Bayern München: O/U 2.5$184.25May 9, 17:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYVfL Wolfsburg vs. FC Bayern München: O/U 2.5$62.55May 9, 17:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYVfL Wolfsburg vs. FC Bayern München: O/U 2.5$10.26May 9, 17:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYVfL Wolfsburg vs. FC Bayern München: O/U 2.5$1.14May 9, 17:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYVfL Wolfsburg vs. FC Bayern München: O/U 2.5$68.40May 9, 17:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYVfL Wolfsburg vs. FC Bayern München: O/U 2.5$12.69May 9, 17:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYVfL Wolfsburg vs. FC Bayern München: O/U 2.5$2.25May 9, 17:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYVfL Wolfsburg vs. FC Bayern München: O/U 2.5$84.60May 9, 17:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYVfL Wolfsburg vs. FC Bayern München: O/U 2.5$0.82May 9, 17:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYVfL Wolfsburg vs. FC Bayern München: O/U 2.5$14.98May 9, 17:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYVfL Wolfsburg vs. FC Bayern München: O/U 2.5$99.90May 9, 17:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYVfL Wolfsburg vs. FC Bayern München: O/U 2.5$17.41May 9, 17:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYVfL Wolfsburg vs. FC Bayern München: O/U 2.5$4.09May 9, 17:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYVfL Wolfsburg vs. FC Bayern München: O/U 2.5$0.95May 9, 17:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYVfL Wolfsburg vs. FC Bayern München: O/U 2.5$0.82May 9, 17:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYVfL Wolfsburg vs. FC Bayern München: O/U 2.5$116.10May 9, 17:28 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 44
- Avg trade size
- $121.84
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 2, 18:31 UTC
- Last active
- May 28, 06:59 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".