Unsung-Commodity
0x9ee8eab980eefaf1139c4db8dd1d8bde0141ef8e
Activity score
65/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$35.81
Total PnL
$-27.89
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill SC Braga win on 2026-05-11?$17.601d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Rio Ave FC win on 2026-05-11?$18.201d ago
- TRADEBUYWill AVS Futebol win on 2026-05-10?$27.902d ago
- REDEEMWill Vitória SC win on 2026-05-04?$70.272d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Vitória SC win on 2026-05-04?$66.129d ago
- REDEEMWill Racing Club de Lens win on 2026-04-24?$67.539d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Racing Club de Lens win on 2026-04-24?$65.6916d ago
- REDEEMWill the match end in a draw?$10.0016d ago
- REDEEMCanucks vs. Oilers$13.5116d ago
- REDEEMLoL: HMBLE vs TITANS (BO1) - LIT Regular Season$30.0016d ago
- TRADEBUYWill the match end in a draw?$9.6523d ago
- TRADEBUYLoL: HMBLE vs TITANS (BO1) - LIT Regular Season$27.6024d ago
- TRADEBUYCanucks vs. Oilers$10.0024d ago
- REDEEMWill Girona FC win on 2026-04-10?$29.9924d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Girona FC win on 2026-04-10?$2.6734d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Girona FC win on 2026-04-10?$0.9734d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Girona FC win on 2026-04-10?$10.1134d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Girona FC win on 2026-04-10?$13.5434d ago
- REWARD$4.7934d ago
- REWARD$1.1734d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 26
- Avg trade size
- $42.91
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 133d ago
- Last active
- 1d ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
