True-Charm
0x9f249d2cda01b7745442a72c76dbfc136aafea55
Wallet digest
Activity score
49/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
10
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-515.17
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- FNATIC
Counter-Strike: fnatic vs Fluxo (BO1)
415 shares @ 70.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 25, 2025$0.00
$-293.54
- TOP ESPORTS
LoL: T1 vs Top Esports (BO5)
187 shares @ 28.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 2, 2025$0.00
$-53.82
- NO
Will T1 win LoL Worlds 2025?
175 shares @ 57.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 9, 2025$0.00
$-100.00
- DOWN
Solana Up or Down - November 24, 8:30AM-8:45AM ET
110 shares @ 1.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 24, 2025$0.00
$-2.00
- RARE ATOM
Counter-Strike: Legacy vs Rare Atom (BO1)
105 shares @ 33.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 25, 2025$0.00
$-35.00
- DOWN
Solana Up or Down - November 24, 6AM ET
62 shares @ 1.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 24, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
- GAMERLEGION
Counter-Strike: GamerLegion vs RED Canids (BO1)
47 shares @ 43.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 25, 2025$0.00
$-20.00
- THE HUNS ESPORTS
Counter-Strike: PARIVISION vs The Huns Esports (BO1)
26 shares @ 18.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 24, 2025$0.00
$-4.77
- NIP
Counter-Strike: NIP vs NRG (BO1)
25 shares @ 8.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 24, 2025$0.00
$-2.04
- GAMERLEGION
Counter-Strike: GamerLegion vs Fluxo (BO1)
11 shares @ 27.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 24, 2025$0.00
$-3.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: fnatic vs Fluxo (BO1)$293.54Nov 24, 22:40 UTC
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: NIP vs Lynn Vision (BO1)$293.54Nov 24, 22:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: NIP vs Lynn Vision (BO1)$215.48Nov 24, 22:22 UTC
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: PARIVISION vs M80 (BO1)$215.47Nov 24, 22:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: PARIVISION vs M80 (BO1)$175.84Nov 24, 21:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: GamerLegion vs RED Canids (BO1)$20.00Nov 24, 21:20 UTC
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: B8 vs The Huns Esports (BO1)$195.84Nov 24, 20:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: B8 vs The Huns Esports (BO1)$150.35Nov 24, 20:31 UTC
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: Imperial vs FlyQuest (BO1)$150.35Nov 24, 20:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Imperial vs FlyQuest (BO1)$139.97Nov 24, 19:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Legacy vs Rare Atom (BO1)$30.00Nov 24, 19:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Legacy vs Rare Atom (BO1)$5.00Nov 24, 19:04 UTC
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: fnatic vs RED Canids (BO1)$174.97Nov 24, 18:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: fnatic vs RED Canids (BO1)$157.30Nov 24, 18:12 UTC
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: FaZe vs Lynn Vision (BO1)$157.30Nov 24, 17:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: FaZe vs Lynn Vision (BO1)$117.96Nov 24, 16:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: GamerLegion vs Fluxo (BO1)$3.00Nov 24, 15:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: NIP vs NRG (BO1)$2.04Nov 24, 14:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: PARIVISION vs The Huns Esports (BO1)$2.77Nov 24, 13:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: PARIVISION vs The Huns Esports (BO1)$2.00Nov 24, 13:47 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 26
- Avg trade size
- $102.29
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 2, 06:01 UTC
- Last active
- Nov 24, 22:40 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".