Wrathful-Empowerment
0xa113d92c8bdd65c4f7e47a086a24ae3b125c284e
Activity score
75/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
16
Open notional
$1.1K
Total PnL
$-37.8K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 16- PHANTOM
Counter-Strike: Lavked vs Phantom - Map 2 Winner
1740 shares @ 58.0¢·now 60.5¢·exp May 4, 2026$1.1K
$43.97
- FAZE
Counter-Strike: G2 vs FaZe - Map 2 Winner
23894 shares @ 11.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 1, 2026$0.00
$-2.8K
- GAMERLEGION
Counter-Strike: Vitality vs GamerLegion - Map 2 Winner
17228 shares @ 14.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 3, 2026$0.00
$-2.5K
- ILLWILL
Counter-Strike: illwill vs 100 Thieves (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2: Closed Qualifier Playoffs
14866 shares @ 31.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-4.7K
- FAZE
Counter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs FaZe - Map 2 Winner
13980 shares @ 27.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-3.9K
- FAZE
Counter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs FaZe - Map 1 Winner
12117 shares @ 38.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-4.7K
- NATUS VINCERE
Counter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs Vitality - Map 3 Winner
11655 shares @ 31.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 3, 2026$0.00
$-3.6K
- NATUS VINCERE
Counter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs Vitality - Map 2 Winner
11200 shares @ 27.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 3, 2026$0.00
$-3.1K
- NATUS VINCERE
Counter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs Vitality - Map 1 Winner
10047 shares @ 34.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 3, 2026$0.00
$-3.4K
- GAMERLEGION
Counter-Strike: Vitality vs GamerLegion - Map 1 Winner
8857 shares @ 12.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 3, 2026$0.00
$-1.1K
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Lavked vs Phantom - Map 2 Winner$88.872m ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Lavked vs Phantom - Map 2 Winner$173.175m ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Lavked vs Phantom - Map 2 Winner$759.656m ago
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: INFURITY Gaming vs BIG Academy - Map 2 Winner$928.8512m ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: INFURITY Gaming vs BIG Academy - Map 2 Winner$253.233h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: INFURITY Gaming vs BIG Academy - Map 2 Winner$253.673h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: AaB Esport vs against All authority - Map 2 Winner$99.713h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: AaB Esport vs against All authority - Map 2 Winner$173.063h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: AaB Esport vs against All authority - Map 2 Winner$101.993h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: AaB Esport vs against All authority - Map 2 Winner$204.023h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: AaB Esport vs against All authority - Map 2 Winner$204.023h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Imperial vs Bounty Hunters Esports (BO3) - ESL Challenger League South America Cup #4 Playoffs$1.1216h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Imperial vs Bounty Hunters Esports (BO3) - ESL Challenger League South America Cup #4 Playoffs$342.4416h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Imperial vs Bounty Hunters Esports (BO3) - ESL Challenger League South America Cup #4 Playoffs$508.7216h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Imperial vs Bounty Hunters Esports (BO3) - ESL Challenger League South America Cup #4 Playoffs$101.7916h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Imperial vs Bounty Hunters Esports - Map 2 Winner$205.1617h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Imperial vs Bounty Hunters Esports - Map 2 Winner$254.8417h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Imperial vs Bounty Hunters Esports - Map 2 Winner$760.2817h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Imperial vs Bounty Hunters Esports - Map 2 Winner$494.8717h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Imperial vs Bounty Hunters Esports - Map 1 Winner$354.2018h ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 49
- Avg trade size
- $430.59
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 2d ago
- Last active
- 2m ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".