Sarcastic-Guidance
0xa1b012d1bc222658a107c7f3dcf6c3fd62e01846
Wallet digest
Activity score
34/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
16
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-2.6K
Realised
$-472.52
Win rate
10%
10 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 16- QARABAĞ AĞDAM FK
Spread: Newcastle United FC (-1.5)
490 shares @ 51.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 18, 2026$0.00
$-250.00
- OVER
FC Utrecht vs. Feyenoord Rotterdam: O/U 2.5
481 shares @ 52.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 8, 2026$0.00
$-250.00
- UNDER
Swansea City AFC vs. Sheffield Wednesday FC: O/U 3.5
354 shares @ 65.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 8, 2026$0.00
$-230.00
- YES
Will AC Milan win on 2026-02-22?
347 shares @ 72.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 22, 2026$0.00
$-250.00
- OVER
1. FC Union Berlin vs. Bayer 04 Leverkusen: O/U 1.5
323 shares @ 76.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 21, 2026$0.00
$-245.15
- OVER
FC Utrecht vs. Feyenoord Rotterdam: O/U 1.5
306 shares @ 81.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 8, 2026$0.00
$-250.00
- YES
Will Real Sociedad de Fútbol win on 2026-02-21?
198 shares @ 63.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 21, 2026$0.00
$-124.51
- OVER
Chelsea FC vs. Burnley FC: O/U 2.5
187 shares @ 67.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 21, 2026$0.00
$-125.00
- OVER
Leeds United FC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 1.5
160 shares @ 78.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 28, 2026$0.00
$-125.00
- OVER
Sheffield Wednesday FC vs. Wrexham AFC: O/U 1.5
131 shares @ 76.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
Recent activity
- TRADESELLReal Sociedad de Fútbol vs. Getafe CF: O/U 1.5$9.62Apr 22, 19:49 UTC
- TRADESELLReal Sociedad de Fútbol vs. Getafe CF: O/U 1.5$11.48Apr 22, 19:48 UTC
- TRADESELLReal Sociedad de Fútbol vs. Getafe CF: O/U 1.5$9.62Apr 22, 19:44 UTC
- TRADESELLReal Sociedad de Fútbol vs. Getafe CF: O/U 1.5$26.65Apr 22, 18:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYReal Sociedad de Fútbol vs. Getafe CF: O/U 1.5$72.00Apr 22, 17:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYReal Sociedad de Fútbol vs. Getafe CF: O/U 1.5$15.76Apr 22, 17:47 UTC
- TRADESELLElche CF vs. Club Atlético de Madrid: O/U 4.5$16.16Apr 22, 17:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYElche CF vs. Club Atlético de Madrid: O/U 4.5$120.00Apr 22, 17:14 UTC
- TRADESELLSpread: Nottingham Forest FC (-2.5)$10.33Apr 19, 14:25 UTC
- TRADESELLSpread: Nottingham Forest FC (-2.5)$3.44Apr 19, 14:24 UTC
- TRADESELLSpread: Nottingham Forest FC (-2.5)$4.58Apr 19, 13:59 UTC
- TRADESELLSpread: Nottingham Forest FC (-2.5)$5.53Apr 19, 13:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Nottingham Forest FC (-2.5)$19.98Apr 19, 12:54 UTC
- TRADESELLFC Lorient vs. Olympique de Marseille: O/U 1.5$84.32Apr 18, 15:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Lorient vs. Olympique de Marseille: O/U 1.5$100.00Apr 18, 14:37 UTC
- TRADESELLTSG 1899 Hoffenheim vs. BV Borussia 09 Dortmund: O/U 4.5$43.60Apr 18, 14:26 UTC
- TRADESELLTSG 1899 Hoffenheim vs. BV Borussia 09 Dortmund: O/U 4.5$14.52Apr 18, 14:25 UTC
- TRADESELLSpread: BV Borussia 09 Dortmund (-1.5)$55.61Apr 18, 14:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: BV Borussia 09 Dortmund (-1.5)$50.00Apr 18, 13:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYTSG 1899 Hoffenheim vs. BV Borussia 09 Dortmund: O/U 4.5$50.00Apr 18, 13:25 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $59.38
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 11, 14:16 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 22, 19:49 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 10 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".