Intent-Flat
0xa25b259f1b940b0fbff9c454a640d6b9f3aa1220
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
24
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-277.47
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 24- YES
Will BV Borussia 09 Dortmund win on 2026-02-25?
622 shares @ 2.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 25, 2026$0.00
$-18.00
- YES
Will Brighton & Hove Albion FC win on 2026-02-14?
600 shares @ 6.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 14, 2026$0.00
$-36.00
- YES
Will Brentford FC win on 2026-02-21?
551 shares @ 3.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 21, 2026$0.00
$-17.00
- YES
Will Wolverhampton Wanderers FC win on 2026-02-18?
402 shares @ 1.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 18, 2026$0.00
$-7.00
- YES
Will SS Lazio win on 2026-02-14?
378 shares @ 9.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 14, 2026$0.00
$-37.00
- YES
Will Club Atlético de Madrid win on 2026-02-14?
367 shares @ 10.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 14, 2026$0.00
$-36.69
- YES
Will FC Internazionale Milano win on 2026-02-18?
295 shares @ 1.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 18, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- YES
Will Burnley FC win on 2026-02-21?
190 shares @ 1.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 21, 2026$0.00
$-3.00
- YES
Will Olympiakós SFP win on 2026-02-18?
167 shares @ 1.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 18, 2026$0.00
$-3.00
- YES
Will Fenerbahçe SK win on 2026-02-19?
161 shares @ 2.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 19, 2026$0.00
$-4.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill Wolverhampton Wanderers FC win on 2026-03-03?$200.00Mar 4, 05:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Wolverhampton Wanderers FC win on 2026-03-03?$24.00Mar 3, 20:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Galatasaray SK win on 2026-02-25?$5.00Feb 25, 20:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill BV Borussia 09 Dortmund win on 2026-02-25?$4.00Feb 25, 18:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill BV Borussia 09 Dortmund win on 2026-02-25?$7.00Feb 25, 18:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill AS Monaco FC win on 2026-02-25?$7.00Feb 25, 18:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Sport Lisboa e Benfica win on 2026-02-25?$7.00Feb 25, 18:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Galatasaray SK win on 2026-02-25?$7.00Feb 25, 18:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill BV Borussia 09 Dortmund win on 2026-02-25?$7.00Feb 25, 18:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - February 21, 4:00PM-4:05PM ET$3.00Feb 21, 21:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYXRP Up or Down - February 21, 4:00PM-4:05PM ET$3.00Feb 21, 21:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYSolana Up or Down - February 21, 4:00PM-4:05PM ET$4.00Feb 21, 21:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Newcastle United FC win on 2026-02-21?$10.00Feb 21, 21:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill RCD Espanyol de Barcelona win on 2026-02-21?$15.00Feb 21, 21:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - February 21, 3:50PM-3:55PM ET$2.00Feb 21, 20:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - February 21, 3:50PM-3:55PM ET$2.00Feb 21, 20:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Brentford FC win on 2026-02-21?$2.00Feb 21, 16:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Aston Villa FC win on 2026-02-21?$4.00Feb 21, 16:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Burnley FC win on 2026-02-21?$3.00Feb 21, 16:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Brentford FC win on 2026-02-21?$15.00Feb 21, 16:20 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 36
- Avg trade size
- $8.21
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 11, 19:21 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 4, 05:59 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".