0xa2883773044ff4177d24d9fa9f670b0d3c1ccd9c
0xa2883773044ff4177d24d9fa9f670b0d3c1ccd9c
Wallet digest
Activity score
58/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
29
Open notional
$4.91
Total PnL
$-36.23
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 29- OVER
Knicks vs. Cavaliers: O/U 222.5
9 shares @ 33.0¢·now 33.5¢·exp May 24, 2026$3.05
$0.05
- KNICKS
Spread: Knicks (-9.5)
9 shares @ 23.0¢·now 21.5¢·exp May 24, 2026$1.87
$-0.13
- YES
CS Cristal leading at halftime?
1000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 21, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
CDP Junior FC vs. CS Cristal: Draw at halftime?
100 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 21, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Exact Score: SC Freiburg 3 - 3 Aston Villa FC?
53 shares @ 1.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Exact Score: SC Freiburg 3 - 2 Aston Villa FC?
50 shares @ 2.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Exact Score: SC Freiburg 3 - 1 Aston Villa FC?
50 shares @ 2.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Exact Score: FC Machida Zelvia 0 - 2 Urawa Red Diamonds?
20 shares @ 5.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 22, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Exact Score: SC Freiburg 2 - 2 Aston Villa FC?
20 shares @ 5.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- UNDER
Thunder vs. Spurs: O/U 217.5
20 shares @ 5.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYKnicks vs. Cavaliers: O/U 222.5$3.09May 23, 13:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Knicks (-9.5)$2.07May 23, 13:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Beijing Guoan FC 2 - 0 Henan FC?$2.07May 23, 12:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Beijing Guoan FC 1 - 0 Henan FC?$2.06May 23, 12:52 UTC
- TRADESELLExact Score: Shanghai Haigang FC 2 - 1 Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC?$0.91May 23, 12:42 UTC
- TRADESELLExact Score: Shanghai Haigang FC 3 - 0 Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC?$0.02May 23, 12:41 UTC
- TRADESELLExact Score: Shanghai Haigang FC 2 - 2 Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC?$0.01May 23, 12:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Shanghai Haigang FC 0 - 0 Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC?$1.04May 23, 11:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Shanghai Haigang FC 3 - 0 Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC?$1.04May 23, 11:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Shanghai Haigang FC 2 - 2 Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC?$1.04May 23, 11:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Shanghai Haigang FC 2 - 1 Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC?$1.03May 23, 11:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Shanghai Haigang FC 2 - 0 Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC?$1.04May 23, 11:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYSanfrecce Hiroshima vs. Nagoya Grampus: O/U 2.5$3.08May 23, 05:03 UTC
- TRADESELLThunder vs. Spurs: O/U 217.5$11.20May 23, 03:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYThunder vs. Spurs: O/U 217.5$1.04May 23, 02:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYThunder vs. Spurs: O/U 217.5$3.07May 23, 00:34 UTC
- TRADESELLSpread: Spurs (-5.5)$2.92May 23, 00:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Spurs (-5.5)$3.08May 22, 17:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYThunder vs. Spurs: O/U 217.5$3.07May 22, 17:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill El Gouna SC vs. Tala'ea El Gaish SC end in a draw?$2.06May 22, 14:15 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 49
- Avg trade size
- $2.06
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 21, 10:36 UTC
- Last active
- May 23, 13:35 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".