Fickle-Clock
0xa32c928ca5e7e308865a7429cd7d034e81dba617
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
68
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-130.63
Realised
$2.20
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 68- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be between $90,000 and $92,000 on January 6?
1000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 6, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $70,000 on March 19?
1000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 19, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- NO
Will Bitcoin reach $68,000 on March 31?
928 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 1, 2026$0.00
$-0.93
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 5, 1PM ET
254 shares @ 0.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 5, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 12:45PM-1:00PM ET
93 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 2, 2026$0.00
$-0.93
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 22, 10:45AM-11:00AM ET
50 shares @ 2.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 22, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down on March 20?
50 shares @ 2.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 20, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 28, 1:15PM-1:30PM ET
39 shares @ 3.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 28, 2026$0.00
$-1.50
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 28, 2:45PM-3:00PM ET
33 shares @ 3.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 28, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- UP
Ethereum Up or Down - March 19, 2:00PM-2:15PM ET
33 shares @ 3.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 19, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYNVIDIA (NVDA) Up or Down on April 10?$2.15Apr 10, 10:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down on April 10?$3.00Apr 10, 09:59 UTC
- TRADESELLBitcoin Up or Down - April 5, 1:45PM-2:00PM ET$1.56Apr 5, 17:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - April 5, 1PM ET$1.00Apr 5, 17:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - April 5, 1:45PM-2:00PM ET$1.00Apr 5, 17:51 UTC
- TRADESELLBitcoin Up or Down - April 5, 1:45PM-1:50PM ET$5.65Apr 5, 17:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - April 5, 1:45PM-1:50PM ET$4.53Apr 5, 17:47 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin dip to $65,000 on April 2?$4.53Apr 5, 17:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $65,000 on April 2?$4.28Apr 2, 17:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 1PM ET$3.00Apr 2, 17:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 12:45PM-1:00PM ET$1.00Apr 2, 16:59 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 12:40PM-12:45PM ET$8.27Apr 2, 16:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 12:40PM-12:45PM ET$5.55Apr 2, 16:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - April 2, 11:15AM-11:30AM ET$1.00Apr 2, 15:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - April 1, 1:30PM-1:45PM ET$1.00Apr 1, 17:40 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 1, 12:45PM-1:00PM ET$0.00Apr 1, 17:28 UTC
- TRADESELLBitcoin Up or Down - April 1, 1:15PM-1:30PM ET$3.70Apr 1, 17:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - April 1, 1:15PM-1:30PM ET$2.00Apr 1, 17:19 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - April 1, 12:45PM-1:00PM ET$3.04Apr 1, 17:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - April 1, 12:45PM-1:00PM ET$2.50Apr 1, 16:51 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 40
- Avg trade size
- $3.82
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 29, 16:16 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 10, 10:04 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".