Long-Stench
0xa3e05da1a54a12cf4ecfd41f3f741be52802016a
Wallet digest
Activity score
55/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
11
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-3.5K
Realised
$2.6K
Win rate
67%
3 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 11- YES
US strikes Iran by February 21, 2026?
39780 shares @ 0.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$0.00
$-278.46
- YES
Will Bitcoin dip to $55,000 in February?
36183 shares @ 5.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 1, 2026$0.00
$-2.1K
- YES
Will Bitcoin dip to $50,000 in February?
21870 shares @ 2.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 1, 2026$0.00
$-477.13
- YES
Will Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in February?
18687 shares @ 2.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 1, 2026$0.00
$-505.08
- YES
US strikes Iran by February 20, 2026?
16067 shares @ 1.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$0.00
$-201.37
- YES
US strikes Iran by February 24, 2026?
10684 shares @ 2.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$0.00
$-257.18
- YES
Will Bitcoin reach $76,000 February 23-March 1?
8894 shares @ 5.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 2, 2026$0.00
$-499.99
- YES
Will Bitcoin dip to $62,000 February 23-March 1?
8829 shares @ 11.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 2, 2026$0.00
$-985.93
- YES
Will Bitcoin reach $80,000 February 23-March 1?
7047 shares @ 1.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 2, 2026$0.00
$-91.47
- YES
Will Bitcoin reach $78,000 February 23-March 1?
5556 shares @ 3.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 2, 2026$0.00
$-199.99
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be between $64,000 and $66,000 on March 3?$487.21Mar 2, 19:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in February?$505.09Feb 26, 12:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $62,000 February 23-March 1?$985.94Feb 25, 19:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $80,000 February 23-March 1?$91.48Feb 25, 17:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $78,000 February 23-March 1?$200.00Feb 25, 17:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $76,000 February 23-March 1?$500.00Feb 25, 17:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS strikes Iran by February 24, 2026?$257.19Feb 24, 23:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $55,000 in February?$644.15Feb 24, 20:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $55,000 in February?$1.5KFeb 24, 18:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $50,000 in February?$477.16Feb 24, 15:58 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin dip to $55,000 in February?$933.22Feb 24, 07:07 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin dip to $50,000 in February?$773.59Feb 24, 07:07 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin dip to $55,000 in February?$2.5KFeb 24, 07:06 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in February?$3.1KFeb 24, 07:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $50,000 in February?$789.47Feb 23, 00:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $55,000 in February?$985.03Feb 22, 14:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in February?$1000.00Feb 22, 14:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS strikes Iran by February 21, 2026?$112.00Feb 22, 00:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS strikes Iran by February 21, 2026?$166.46Feb 22, 00:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS strikes Iran by February 20, 2026?$201.38Feb 20, 23:07 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 21
- Avg trade size
- $868.41
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 19, 20:04 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 2, 19:27 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 3 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".