Wallet profile

Fussy-Dad

0xa59c570a9eca148da55f6e1f47a538c0c600bb62

activity 84/100

Wallet digest

active

Activity score

84/100

Performance measurable

Open positions

79

Open notional

$5.6K

Total PnL

$-9.6K

Realised

$2.52

Win rate

71%

14 closed

Guardrail: wallet activity is not profitability, and large trades are not smart money. Use the sample, concentration, and copy-risk dimensions before reading this profile as meaningful.

Largest open positions

showing 10 of 79

Recent activity

Persistent ledger timeline

persistent

Ledger volume

$11.9K

Trades

1

Buy share

100%

Window

May 21, 03:50 UTC → May 21, 23:51 UTC

Last 30 days · daily volumemax $0.00

Wallet edge sanity

Needs review

28/100
read-only

Useful as a watchlist input, but the edge claim still needs resolved history, cost, and source checks.

PnL is mostly mark-to-market

Open-position PnL can disappear if liquidity, exit price, or final resolution changes.

Elevated mirror risk

Use this wallet as an attention signal only, then verify liquidity and resolution risk.

Late-entry profile

Many positions were entered near obvious prices, which can inflate win rate while hiding tail risk.

Required before treating wallet flow as useful

Resolved-only performance

71% win rate over 14 closed markets.

Copy-lag simulation

A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.

Liquidity and exit

Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.

Resolution-source risk

The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.

Survivorship bias

Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.

Wallet intelligence filter

Watch only

0/100
no PredictFoliopaper-only

Wallet flow is useful for attention, but missing/review stages stop it from becoming paper attribution.

Wallet signal
review

45 live trades, 2 ledger trades, copy-risk 56/100.

Resolved-only track record
review

14 closed markets. Enough to inspect, not enough to trust.

Cost / slippage
missing

No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.

Resolution risk
missing

No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.

Market liquidity
missing

No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.

Copy-lag simulation
missing

No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.

Paper-only attribution
missing

No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.

Ledger intelligence

persistent

7d volume

$0.00

0 trades

30d volume

$0.00

0 trades

Buy share

100%

Sample

low

2 ledger trades

Top market concentration

Will Elon Musk post 220-239 tweets from May 15 to May 22, 2026?

$6.4K · 54% of recorded whale volume

Recorded market concentration

Will Elon Musk post 220-239 tweets from May 15 to May 22, 2026?54% of recorded volume$6.4KWill Elon Musk post 240-259 tweets from May 15 to May 22, 2026?46% of recorded volume$5.5K

Profile dimensions

Activity72 / 100

Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.

Performance confidence47 / 100

How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.

Specialization0 / 100

Share of trades concentrated in their top category.

Early-entry4 / 100

Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.

Copy-risk56 / 100

How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.

Trades (all time)
45
Avg trade size
$426.05
Top category
—
Category concentration
0%
First seen
Jul 21, 15:58 UTC
Last active
Jul 22, 00:46 UTC
Win rate sample
14 closed

The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.

View on PolymarketView on Polygonscan
updated 01:05:57 UTC·src:Polymarket Data