Trustworthy-Window
0xa5aac32824fb9ad68c6299c19798864b77925407
Wallet digest
Activity score
84/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$98.32
Total PnL
$0.20
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) hit (HIGH) $296 in June?$98.13Jun 24, 14:47 UTC
- REDEEMWill XRP reach $1.50 on May 24?$98.10Jun 24, 14:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill XRP reach $1.50 on May 24?$97.91May 24, 21:39 UTC
- REDEEMWill Solana reach $150 in April?$97.99May 24, 21:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Solana reach $150 in April?$97.72Apr 22, 18:17 UTC
- REDEEMWill Solana reach $150 in March?$97.72Apr 22, 18:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Solana reach $150 in March?$97.43Mar 15, 13:45 UTC
- REDEEMWill Solana dip to $50 in February?$27.95Mar 15, 13:42 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin dip to $50,000 in February?$30.77Mar 15, 13:42 UTC
- REDEEMWill XRP dip to $0.80 in February?$39.99Mar 15, 13:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill XRP dip to $0.80 in February?$39.95Feb 28, 12:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Solana dip to $50 in February?$27.92Feb 28, 12:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $50,000 in February?$30.68Feb 28, 12:56 UTC
- REDEEMWill Amazon dip to $156 in January?$7.14Feb 28, 12:54 UTC
- REDEEMWill NVIDIA (NVDA) close above $150 end of January?$9.89Feb 28, 12:54 UTC
- REDEEMWill Meta reach $880 in January?$10.00Feb 28, 12:54 UTC
- REDEEMWill Lighter dip to $1.00 in January?$14.60Feb 28, 12:54 UTC
- REDEEMWill Opendoor dip to $1.25 in January?$17.73Feb 28, 12:54 UTC
- REDEEMWill Netflix (NFLX) close above $0.00 end of January?$19.00Feb 28, 12:54 UTC
- REDEEMWill Ethereum dip to $1,800 in January?$20.20Feb 28, 12:54 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Wallet edge sanity
Do not mirror
0/100Treat this wallet as noise/context only until resolved history, copy-risk, and liquidity checks improve.
Win rate is hidden until at least 3 closed markets exist for this wallet.
Large size, concentration, or thin history makes this wallet unsafe to imitate.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
Only 0 closed markets; headline win rate is intentionally hidden.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Blocked
0/100Wallet flow is blocked as an intelligence signal until hard failures are fixed.
Wallet activity exists, but copy-risk is too high for interpretation.
Too few closed markets. Do not infer edge from open PnL or leaderboard rank.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 21
- Avg trade size
- $33.08
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 26, 17:22 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 24, 14:47 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.