Quaint-Plover
0xa5e83423126dbc6cdb34f10f37f5d27668ab95f5
Wallet digest
Activity score
57/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
32
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-145.2K
Realised
$1.4K
Win rate
67%
3 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 32- YES
Will Bitcoin reach $98,000 January 19-25?
100000 shares @ 4.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 26, 2026$0.00
$-4.0K
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - January 21, 10:00PM-10:15PM ET
54521 shares @ 17.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 22, 2026$0.00
$-9.4K
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - January 20, 8:15PM-8:30PM ET
40995 shares @ 34.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 21, 2026$0.00
$-14.3K
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - January 20, 10:00PM-10:15PM ET
38537 shares @ 34.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 21, 2026$0.00
$-13.3K
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - January 21, 2:45AM-3:00AM ET
37838 shares @ 12.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 21, 2026$0.00
$-4.7K
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - January 21, 8:30PM-8:45PM ET
34861 shares @ 33.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 22, 2026$0.00
$-11.7K
- YES
Will Bitcoin reach $100,000 January 19-25?
28335 shares @ 1.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 26, 2026$0.00
$-548.53
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - January 22, 1:45AM-2:00AM ET
24827 shares @ 33.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 22, 2026$0.00
$-8.3K
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - January 21, 1:30AM-1:45AM ET
24122 shares @ 0.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 21, 2026$0.00
$-197.97
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - January 22, 9:45PM-10:00PM ET
22797 shares @ 21.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 23, 2026$0.00
$-4.9K
Recent activity
- REDEEMFlying Tulip FDV above $1B one day after launch?$5.2KFeb 28, 02:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYFlying Tulip FDV above $1.5B one day after launch?$11.38Feb 15, 00:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYFlying Tulip FDV above $1.5B one day after launch?$7.31Feb 15, 00:33 UTC
- MAKER_REBATE$14.86Jan 28, 00:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 27, 8AM ET$91.52Jan 27, 13:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 27, 8AM ET$154.44Jan 27, 13:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 27, 8AM ET$39.75Jan 27, 13:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 27, 8AM ET$25.85Jan 27, 13:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 27, 8AM ET$19.27Jan 27, 13:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 27, 8AM ET$9.50Jan 27, 13:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 27, 8AM ET$12.22Jan 27, 13:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 27, 8AM ET$282.00Jan 27, 13:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 27, 8AM ET$72.68Jan 27, 13:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 27, 8AM ET$25.85Jan 27, 13:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 27, 8AM ET$5.06Jan 27, 13:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 27, 8AM ET$282.00Jan 27, 13:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 27, 8AM ET$93.86Jan 27, 13:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 27, 8AM ET$141.00Jan 27, 13:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 27, 8AM ET$64.85Jan 27, 13:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 27, 8AM ET$470.00Jan 27, 13:09 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 48
- Avg trade size
- $108.47
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 27, 13:09 UTC
- Last active
- Feb 28, 02:58 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 3 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".