Zealous-Soliloquy
0xa69b9933a2b7cdeeffaf29a119543f743c397b0c
Activity score
79/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
93
Open notional
$2.0K
Total PnL
$-58.3K
Realised
$117.69
Win rate
60%
43 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 93- BANGLADESH
T20 Series Bangladesh vs. New Zealand: Bangladesh vs New Zealand
5458 shares @ 44.0¢·now 37.5¢·exp May 9, 2026$2.0K
$-352.49
- IRELAND
Bangladesh T20 Series: Bangladesh vs Ireland (Game 3)
35418 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 9, 2025$0.00
$-39.99
- LUCKNOW SUPER GIANTS
Indian Premier League: Punjab Kings vs Lucknow Super Giants
28035 shares @ 8.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 26, 2026$0.00
$-2.4K
- ROYAL CHALLENGERS BANGALORE
Indian Premier League: Rajasthan Royals vs Royal Challengers Bangalore
19815 shares @ 20.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 17, 2026$0.00
$-4.0K
- KOLKATA KNIGHT RIDERS
Indian Premier League: Kolkata Knight Riders vs Lucknow Super Giants
15390 shares @ 65.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 16, 2026$0.00
$-10.1K
- PAKISTAN
T20 World Cup: England vs Pakistan
11919 shares @ 42.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 3, 2026$0.00
$-5.0K
- SUNRISERS HYDERABAD
Indian Premier League: Royal Challengers Bengaluru vs Sunrisers Hyderabad
11630 shares @ 14.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$0.00
$-1.7K
- DELHI CAPITALS
Indian Premier League: Delhi Capitals vs Gujarat Titans
10353 shares @ 38.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 15, 2026$0.00
$-3.9K
- SCOTLAND
T20 World Cup: Nepal vs Scotland (Game 1)
9689 shares @ 83.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 24, 2026$0.00
$-8.1K
- RAJASTHAN ROYALS
Indian Premier League: Rajasthan Royals vs Delhi Capitals
8971 shares @ 20.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 8, 2026$0.00
$-1.9K
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYT20 Series Bangladesh vs. New Zealand: Bangladesh vs New Zealand$64.0415m ago
- TRADEBUYT20 Series Bangladesh vs. New Zealand: Bangladesh vs New Zealand$25.2018m ago
- TRADEBUYT20 Series Bangladesh vs. New Zealand: Bangladesh vs New Zealand$196.1126m ago
- TRADEBUYT20 Series Bangladesh vs. New Zealand: Bangladesh vs New Zealand$30.781h ago
- TRADEBUYT20 Series Bangladesh vs. New Zealand: Bangladesh vs New Zealand$3.611h ago
- TRADEBUYT20 Series Bangladesh vs. New Zealand: Bangladesh vs New Zealand$1.641h ago
- TRADEBUYT20 Series Bangladesh vs. New Zealand: Bangladesh vs New Zealand$0.831h ago
- TRADEBUYT20 Series Bangladesh vs. New Zealand: Bangladesh vs New Zealand$2.451h ago
- TRADEBUYT20 Series Bangladesh vs. New Zealand: Bangladesh vs New Zealand$60.991h ago
- TRADEBUYT20 Series Bangladesh vs. New Zealand: Bangladesh vs New Zealand$21.681h ago
- TRADEBUYT20 Series Bangladesh vs. New Zealand: Bangladesh vs New Zealand$152.261h ago
- TRADEBUYT20 Series Bangladesh vs. New Zealand: Bangladesh vs New Zealand$0.852h ago
- TRADEBUYT20 Series Bangladesh vs. New Zealand: Bangladesh vs New Zealand$0.832h ago
- TRADEBUYT20 Series Bangladesh vs. New Zealand: Bangladesh vs New Zealand$384.002h ago
- TRADEBUYT20 Series Bangladesh vs. New Zealand: Bangladesh vs New Zealand$4.432h ago
- TRADEBUYT20 Series Bangladesh vs. New Zealand: Bangladesh vs New Zealand$0.862h ago
- TRADEBUYT20 Series Bangladesh vs. New Zealand: Bangladesh vs New Zealand$0.892h ago
- TRADEBUYT20 Series Bangladesh vs. New Zealand: Bangladesh vs New Zealand$1.882h ago
- TRADEBUYT20 Series Bangladesh vs. New Zealand: Bangladesh vs New Zealand$5.882h ago
- TRADEBUYT20 Series Bangladesh vs. New Zealand: Bangladesh vs New Zealand$169.092h ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 45
- Avg trade size
- $158.32
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 2d ago
- Last active
- 15m ago
- Win rate sample
- 43 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".