Sniveling-Disclaimer
0xa6ed26ee1a3e9f56f93dc824938daeb01c355c1d
Wallet digest
Activity score
43/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-1.4K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYHornets vs. Nets: O/U 218.5$19.81Mar 31, 06:38 UTC
- REDEEMRacing de Chivilcoy vs. Penarol$547.00Jan 16, 06:57 UTC
- REDEEMAnyang vs. Daegu Pegasus$573.00Jan 15, 05:21 UTC
- REDEEMKHL: Shanghai Dragons vs. SKA St. Petersburg$3.2KJan 15, 05:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYKHL: Shanghai Dragons vs. SKA St. Petersburg$2.6KJan 14, 05:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYKHL: Avtomobilist Yekaterinburg vs. Traktor$1.2KJan 14, 05:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYAnyang vs. Daegu Pegasus$383.91Jan 14, 05:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYSonic Boom vs. KCC Egis$225.20Jan 14, 05:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYRacing de Chivilcoy vs. Penarol$240.68Jan 14, 05:38 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 6
- Avg trade size
- $771.78
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 14, 05:38 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 31, 06:38 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".