0xa86120611de85b1f7c38bd8d8b7580cd31b0a2a7
0xa86120611de85b1f7c38bd8d8b7580cd31b0a2a7
Wallet digest
Activity score
85/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
65
Open notional
$101.04
Total PnL
$-0.96
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 65- OVER
Sanfrecce Hiroshima vs. Nagoya Grampus: O/U 4.5
7 shares @ 26.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$7.42
$5.42
- NO
Will Kataller Toyama win on 2026-05-23?
7 shares @ 43.7¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$6.87
$3.87
- MOUZ
Counter-Strike: Team Falcons vs MOUZ - Map 1 Winner
6 shares @ 48.6¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$6.17
$3.17
- OVER
Thespa Gunma vs. SC Sagamihara: O/U 3.5
6 shares @ 50.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$5.89
$2.89
- UNDER
Renofa Yamaguchi FC vs. Roasso Kumamoto: O/U 2.5
5 shares @ 55.5¢·now 96.5¢·exp May 23, 2026$5.22
$2.22
- NO
Will Sagan Tosu win on 2026-05-23?
4 shares @ 50.0¢·now 99.5¢·exp May 23, 2026$3.98
$1.98
- YES
Will Sanfrecce Hiroshima win on 2026-05-23?
4 shares @ 50.0¢·now 98.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$3.92
$1.92
- NO
Will Hokkaidō Consadole Sapporo win on 2026-05-23?
4 shares @ 85.7¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$3.50
$0.50
- TEAM FALCONS
Counter-Strike: Team Falcons vs MOUZ - Map 2 Winner
3 shares @ 65.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$3.08
$1.08
- UNDER
Hokkaidō Consadole Sapporo vs. Júbilo Iwata: O/U 2.5
3 shares @ 68.0¢·now 92.5¢·exp May 23, 2026$2.72
$0.72
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Middlesbrough FC win on 2026-05-23?$1.01May 23, 07:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Renofa Yamaguchi FC win on 2026-05-23?$1.02May 23, 06:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYHokkaidō Consadole Sapporo vs. Júbilo Iwata: O/U 1.5$1.01May 23, 06:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYVegalta Sendai vs. Yokohama FC: O/U 2.5$1.01May 23, 06:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYFujieda MYFC vs. Iwaki FC: O/U 1.5$1.00May 23, 06:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYSagan Tosu vs. FC Ryūkyū: O/U 2.5$1.00May 23, 06:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Ryūkyū win on 2026-05-23?$1.00May 23, 06:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Roasso Kumamoto win on 2026-05-23?$1.00May 23, 06:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Júbilo Iwata win on 2026-05-23?$1.01May 23, 06:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Júbilo Iwata win on 2026-05-23?$1.02May 23, 06:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYHokkaidō Consadole Sapporo vs. Júbilo Iwata: O/U 2.5$1.01May 23, 06:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYHokkaidō Consadole Sapporo vs. Júbilo Iwata: O/U 2.5$1.01May 23, 06:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYHokkaidō Consadole Sapporo vs. Júbilo Iwata: O/U 3.5$1.00May 23, 06:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Gifu vs. RB Ōmiya Ardija: O/U 3.5$1.02May 23, 06:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Gifu vs. RB Ōmiya Ardija: O/U 3.5$1.02May 23, 06:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYSagan Tosu vs. FC Ryūkyū: O/U 2.5$1.00May 23, 06:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYFujieda MYFC vs. Iwaki FC: O/U 1.5$1.02May 23, 06:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hokkaidō Consadole Sapporo win on 2026-05-23?$1.00May 23, 06:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYSanfrecce Hiroshima vs. Nagoya Grampus: O/U 4.5$1.00May 23, 06:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill RB Ōmiya Ardija win on 2026-05-23?$1.00May 23, 06:16 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 41
- Avg trade size
- $1.01
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 23, 05:45 UTC
- Last active
- May 23, 07:02 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".