Both-Harpsichord
0xa8d1917c58576f3c0675c939641dc248ef3c1f2a
Wallet digest
Activity score
56/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
18
Open notional
$3.45
Total PnL
$-716.50
Realised
$0.99
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 18- NATUS VINCERE
Dota 2: Natus Vincere vs Team Tidebound (BO1)
3 shares @ 60.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Nov 25, 2025$3.45
$1.38
- UNDER
Games Total: O/U 4.5
400 shares @ 27.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 23, 2025$0.00
$-108.98
- XTREME GAMING
Dota 2: Xtreme Gaming vs Yakult Brothers (BO1)
200 shares @ 36.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 29, 2025$0.00
$-72.00
- HEROIC
Dota 2: MOUZ vs Heroic (BO1)
200 shares @ 30.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 26, 2025$0.00
$-60.00
- OG
Dota 2: MOUZ vs OG (BO1)
200 shares @ 17.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 26, 2025$0.00
$-35.00
- OG
Dota 2: Team Yandex vs OG (BO1)
200 shares @ 45.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 28, 2025$0.00
$-90.00
- NATUS VINCERE
Dota 2: Tundra Esports vs Natus Vincere (BO1)
200 shares @ 17.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 26, 2025$0.00
$-35.00
- NATUS VINCERE
Dota 2: Xtreme Gaming vs Natus Vincere (BO1)
200 shares @ 43.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 27, 2025$0.00
$-85.99
- XTREME GAMING
Dota 2: Xtreme Gaming vs MOUZ (BO1)
150 shares @ 25.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 25, 2025$0.00
$-38.50
- MOUZ
Dota 2: MOUZ vs Team Falcons (BO3)
100 shares @ 15.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 11, 2025$0.00
$-15.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Xtreme Gaming vs Team Spirit - Game 2 Winner$0.89Dec 17, 16:49 UTC
- TRADESELLDota 2: Xtreme Gaming vs Team Spirit - Game 1 Winner$35.00Dec 17, 15:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Xtreme Gaming vs Team Spirit - Game 1 Winner$22.00Dec 17, 15:41 UTC
- TRADESELLDota 2: Xtreme Gaming vs Team Spirit - Game 1 Winner$40.15Dec 17, 15:39 UTC
- TRADESELLDota 2: Xtreme Gaming vs Team Spirit - Game 1 Winner$15.79Dec 17, 15:39 UTC
- TRADESELLDota 2: Xtreme Gaming vs Team Spirit - Game 1 Winner$2.00Dec 17, 15:39 UTC
- TRADESELLDota 2: Xtreme Gaming vs Team Spirit - Game 1 Winner$2.06Dec 17, 15:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Xtreme Gaming vs Team Spirit - Game 1 Winner$15.99Dec 17, 15:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Xtreme Gaming vs Team Spirit - Game 1 Winner$22.01Dec 17, 15:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: MOUZ vs Team Falcons (BO3)$15.00Dec 11, 12:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Team Tidebound vs Virtus.pro (BO3)$27.50Dec 11, 11:31 UTC
- REDEEMDota 2: MOUZ vs Tundra Esports (BO3)$0.00Dec 6, 15:22 UTC
- REDEEMDota 2: MOUZ vs Tundra Esports (BO3)$80.00Dec 6, 15:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: MOUZ vs Tundra Esports (BO3)$64.00Dec 6, 11:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Natus Vincere vs MOUZ (BO3)$4.53Dec 5, 11:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Natus Vincere vs MOUZ (BO3)$6.60Dec 5, 11:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Natus Vincere vs MOUZ (BO3)$14.78Dec 5, 11:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Natus Vincere vs MOUZ (BO3)$0.49Dec 5, 11:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Natus Vincere vs MOUZ (BO3)$6.60Dec 5, 11:12 UTC
- TRADESELLDota 2: Team Tidebound vs Natus Vincere (BO3)$79.00Nov 30, 15:46 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 48
- Avg trade size
- $39.15
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 27, 14:28 UTC
- Last active
- Dec 17, 16:49 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".