Insidious-Explorer
0xa952c34a34c05b13a08c291c533bd13755b714a5
Activity score
79/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
84
Open notional
$298.05
Total PnL
$-9.6K
Realised
$267.23
Win rate
60%
5 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 84- VITALITY
Counter-Strike: BetBoom Team vs Vitality (BO3) - IEM Atlanta Group A
219 shares @ 92.0¢·now 92.5¢·exp May 13, 2026$202.19
$1.09
- UNDER
Games Total: O/U 2.5
165 shares @ 61.0¢·now 58.0¢·exp May 13, 2026$95.87
$-4.96
- PARIVISION
Counter-Strike: Team Falcons vs PARIVISION - Map 2 Winner
1986 shares @ 12.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 20, 2026$0.00
$-240.00
- NO
US strikes Iran by March 2, 2026?
1206 shares @ 73.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 30, 2026$0.00
$-891.62
- FAZE
Counter-Strike: FaZe vs PARIVISION (BO3) - PGL Cluj-Napoca Group Stage
1154 shares @ 49.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 16, 2026$0.00
$-575.85
- ASTRALIS
Counter-Strike: FUT Esports vs Astralis (BO3) - PGL Cluj-Napoca Group Stage
1060 shares @ 5.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 16, 2026$0.00
$-53.00
- JD GAMING
LoL: JD Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 2 Winner
1000 shares @ 39.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 10, 2026$0.00
$-396.78
- NINJAS IN PYJAMAS
LoL: Weibo Gaming vs Ninjas in Pyjamas - Game 1 Winner
808 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 10, 2026$0.00
$-404.04
- WEIBO GAMING
LoL: Weibo Gaming vs Bilibili Gaming - Game 2 Winner
800 shares @ 9.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 27, 2026$0.00
$-72.00
- THEMONGOLZ
Counter-Strike: TheMongolz vs Natus Vincere - Map 2 Winner
732 shares @ 27.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 13, 2026$0.00
$-200.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYGames Total: O/U 2.5$102.013h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: BetBoom Team vs Vitality (BO3) - IEM Atlanta Group A$201.583h ago
- TRADESELLLoL: Invictus Gaming vs Bilibili Gaming (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$786.793h ago
- REDEEMLoL: JD Gaming vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$0.544h ago
- TRADEBUYLoL: Invictus Gaming vs Bilibili Gaming (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$509.514h ago
- MAKER_REBATE$7.782d ago
- REDEEMLoL: Weibo Gaming vs Ninjas in Pyjamas - Game 2 Winner$0.002d ago
- TRADESELLLoL: JD Gaming vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$960.012d ago
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$266.802d ago
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$102.962d ago
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$1.252d ago
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend$129.002d ago
- TRADESELLLoL: JD Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 1 Winner$1.0K2d ago
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 2 Winner$2.002d ago
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 2 Winner$169.872d ago
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 2 Winner$2.002d ago
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 2 Winner$7.262d ago
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 2 Winner$219.572d ago
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 1 Winner$100.002d ago
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 1 Winner$0.902d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 43
- Avg trade size
- $152.11
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 5d ago
- Last active
- 3h ago
- Win rate sample
- 5 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
