Antique-Name
0xa9e6118f2525bed4758113684da818c047b3fb0f
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
108
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-5.2K
Realised
$-18.91
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 108- 76ERS
76ers vs. Celtics
1297 shares @ 14.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 2, 2026$0.00
$-192.82
- MAGIC
Pistons vs. Magic
1015 shares @ 13.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 1, 2026$0.00
$-140.66
- CAVALIERS
Cavaliers vs. Pistons
617 shares @ 32.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 5, 2026$0.00
$-197.35
- TRAIL BLAZERS
Trail Blazers vs. Hawks
567 shares @ 31.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 1, 2026$0.00
$-175.65
- MAVERICKS
Timberwolves vs. Mavericks
465 shares @ 11.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 31, 2026$0.00
$-51.17
- TRAIL BLAZERS
Trail Blazers vs. Hornets
448 shares @ 28.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 28, 2026$0.00
$-125.32
- NETS
Cavaliers vs. Nets
413 shares @ 35.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 1, 2026$0.00
$-144.60
- PISTONS
Pistons vs. Cavaliers
408 shares @ 12.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 4, 2026$0.00
$-48.91
- CELTICS
Celtics vs. Nuggets
398 shares @ 41.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 26, 2026$0.00
$-164.91
- JAZZ
Jazz vs. Rockets
333 shares @ 0.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 24, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
Recent activity
- TRADESELLRoland Garros ATP: Joao Fonseca vs Novak Djokovic$285.36May 29, 19:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros ATP: Joao Fonseca vs Novak Djokovic$20.76May 29, 17:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Gentle Mates vs Eternal Fire - Map 2 Winner$18.72May 29, 17:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros ATP: Joao Fonseca vs Novak Djokovic$19.65May 29, 17:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros ATP: Joao Fonseca vs Novak Djokovic$36.49May 29, 16:41 UTC
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: Alliance vs Sharks - Map 1 Winner$95.53May 29, 16:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Alliance vs Sharks - Map 2 Winner$79.12May 29, 14:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Alliance vs Sharks - Map 1 Winner$39.90May 29, 14:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYSet 1 Winner: Fonseca vs Djokovic$32.98May 29, 14:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: 9z vs FaZe (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2 Playoffs$47.40May 29, 13:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: 9z vs FaZe (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2 Playoffs$77.76May 29, 13:34 UTC
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: M80 vs Voca - Map 3 Winner$208.99May 29, 13:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: M80 vs Voca - Map 3 Winner$87.66May 29, 02:34 UTC
- TRADESELLThunder vs. Spurs$256.14May 29, 02:32 UTC
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: magic vs FaZe (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2 Playoffs$98.69May 28, 20:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYThunder vs. Spurs$156.50May 28, 20:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: magic vs FaZe (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2 Playoffs$62.53May 28, 19:57 UTC
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: BESTIA vs Galorys (BO3) - Circuit X Base Recife Group A$361.45May 28, 19:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: BESTIA vs Galorys (BO3) - Circuit X Base Recife Group A$68.87May 28, 18:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: magic vs FaZe - Map 1 Winner$35.32May 28, 17:45 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 47
- Avg trade size
- $83.39
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 3, 19:09 UTC
- Last active
- May 29, 19:04 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 2 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".