Hearty-Science
0xa9ef8a4d894c39919134b54a78941f82e1da810f
Wallet digest
Activity score
43/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-29.34
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 17, 12:50PM-12:55PM ET$29.36Mar 17, 16:53 UTC
- TRADESELLBitcoin Up or Down - March 17, 12:45PM-12:50PM ET$29.36Mar 17, 16:50 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - March 17, 12:35PM-12:40PM ET$0.00Mar 17, 16:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 17, 12:45PM-12:50PM ET$9.91Mar 17, 16:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 17, 12:35PM-12:40PM ET$1.00Mar 17, 16:38 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - March 17, 12:30PM-12:35PM ET$0.00Mar 17, 16:37 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - March 17, 12:30PM-12:35PM ET$0.00Mar 17, 16:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 17, 12:30PM-12:35PM ET$1.00Mar 17, 16:34 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 5
- Avg trade size
- $14.13
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 17, 16:34 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 17, 16:53 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".