Electric-Playground
0xab93bfec4118337510b23852a97db710a7db8479
Wallet digest
Activity score
77/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$364.55
Total PnL
$-14.41
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- KABUM! ILHA DAS LENDAS
LoL: Vivo Keyd Stars Academy vs KaBuM! Ilha das Lendas - Game 3 Winner
364 shares @ 54.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jun 2, 2026$364.39
$167.62
- KABUM! ILHA DAS LENDAS
LoL: Vivo Keyd Stars Academy vs KaBuM! Ilha das Lendas (BO5) - Circuito Desafiante Playoffs
316 shares @ 57.6¢·now 0.1¢·exp Jun 2, 2026$0.16
$-182.03
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYLoL: Vivo Keyd Stars Academy vs KaBuM! Ilha das Lendas - Game 3 Winner$199.49Jun 1, 22:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Vivo Keyd Stars Academy vs KaBuM! Ilha das Lendas (BO5) - Circuito Desafiante Playoffs$184.51Jun 1, 20:36 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 2
- Avg trade size
- $192.00
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jun 1, 20:36 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 1, 22:10 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".