Motherly-Machine
0xacbc3a4da872a712705d5ac2337001c3a55ee374
Wallet digest
Activity score
53/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
54
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-3.0K
Realised
$51.20
Win rate
57%
7 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 54- UNDER
FC Internazionale Milano vs. Pisa SC: O/U 4.5
714 shares @ 56.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 23, 2026$0.00
$-400.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - January 21, 6:15PM-6:30PM ET
400 shares @ 44.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 21, 2026$0.00
$-176.00
- YES
Will CR Flamengo win on 2026-02-04?
375 shares @ 55.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 4, 2026$0.00
$-210.00
- TEAM NEMESIS
Counter-Strike: BIG Academy vs Team Nemesis - Map 2 Winner
335 shares @ 79.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 22, 2026$0.00
$-265.00
- YES
Will FC Bayern München vs. FC Augsburg end in a draw?
300 shares @ 10.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 24, 2026$0.00
$-30.00
- GOLDEN KNIGHTS
Flyers vs. Golden Knights
264 shares @ 59.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 20, 2026$0.00
$-158.00
- MIAMI
Miami vs. Indiana
250 shares @ 20.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 20, 2026$0.00
$-50.00
- THUNDER
Pacers vs. Thunder
250 shares @ 15.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 24, 2026$0.00
$-39.50
- UNDER
Wizards vs. Hornets: O/U 233.5
245 shares @ 49.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 24, 2026$0.00
$-120.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - January 20, 2:45AM-3:00AM ET
214 shares @ 79.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 20, 2026$0.00
$-168.83
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYCA Huracán vs. CA San Lorenzo de Almagro: Both Teams to Score$15.00Feb 8, 22:36 UTC
- TRADESELLSpread: Sport Lisboa e Benfica (-1.5)$18.33Feb 8, 22:33 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Sport Lisboa e Benfica win on 2026-02-08?$2.44Feb 8, 22:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Sport Lisboa e Benfica win on 2026-02-08?$2.49Feb 8, 22:21 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Sport Lisboa e Benfica vs. FC Alverca end in a draw?$2.48Feb 8, 22:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Sport Lisboa e Benfica (-1.5)$14.82Feb 8, 22:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Sport Lisboa e Benfica vs. FC Alverca end in a draw?$15.00Feb 8, 22:07 UTC
- TRADESELLWill CA Independiente win on 2026-02-08?$29.82Feb 8, 22:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CA Independiente win on 2026-02-08?$26.34Feb 8, 21:51 UTC
- TRADESELLSpread: Real Madrid CF (-1.5)$1.54Feb 8, 21:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Real Madrid CF (-1.5)$30.00Feb 8, 21:41 UTC
- TRADESELLWill SS Lazio win on 2026-02-08?$54.81Feb 8, 21:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill SS Lazio win on 2026-02-08?$45.51Feb 8, 20:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CA Central Córdoba win on 2026-02-06?$53.00Feb 6, 21:51 UTC
- TRADESELLRC Celta de Vigo vs. CA Osasuna: O/U 1.5$36.99Feb 6, 21:41 UTC
- TRADESELLWill CA Osasuna win on 2026-02-06?$9.10Feb 6, 21:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CA Osasuna win on 2026-02-06?$17.50Feb 6, 20:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYRC Celta de Vigo vs. CA Osasuna: O/U 1.5$20.00Feb 6, 20:30 UTC
- TRADESELLAl Nassr Saudi Club vs. Al Ittihad Saudi Club: Both Teams to Score$69.93Feb 6, 20:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Nassr Saudi Club vs. Al Ittihad Saudi Club: Both Teams to Score$45.60Feb 6, 18:44 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $26.26
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 5, 21:39 UTC
- Last active
- Feb 8, 22:36 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 7 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".