Soupy-Archives-Hammock
0xacd10a4a95aebed4e8cf172ad3f6340f15a60689
Wallet digest
Activity score
66/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
16
Open notional
$41.65
Total PnL
$-304.35
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 16- REAL SPORTING DE GIJÓN
Spread: Real Sporting de Gijón (-1.5)
243 shares @ 8.2¢·now 17.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$41.25
$21.25
- YES
Antoine Griezmann: Anytime Goalscorer
69 shares @ 43.7¢·now 0.4¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.27
$-29.73
- YES
Will Levante UD vs. RCD Mallorca end in a draw?
83 shares @ 24.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.04
$-19.96
- REAL MADRID CF
Spread: Real Madrid CF (-1.5)
77 shares @ 26.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.04
$-19.96
- YES
Will Athletic Club win on 2026-05-17?
75 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.04
$-29.96
- YES
Will RC Strasbourg Alsace win on 2026-05-07?
102 shares @ 49.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 7, 2026$0.00
$-50.00
- YES
Will Villarreal CF win on 2026-05-10?
97 shares @ 31.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 10, 2026$0.00
$-30.00
- YES
Will Club Atlético de Madrid win on 2026-05-09?
94 shares @ 53.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 9, 2026$0.00
$-50.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - May 10, 1:15PM-1:30PM ET
91 shares @ 11.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 10, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- YES
Will RCD Espanyol de Barcelona win on 2026-05-09?
87 shares @ 23.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 9, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill CA Osasuna vs. Club Atlético de Madrid end in a draw?$0.00May 17, 18:59 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: FC Barcelona (-1.5)$0.00May 17, 18:59 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: Rayo Vallecano de Madrid (-1.5)$0.00May 17, 18:59 UTC
- REDEEMExact Score: Valencia CF 2 - 2 Rayo Vallecano de Madrid?$0.00May 17, 18:59 UTC
- REDEEMWill Rayo Vallecano de Madrid win on 2026-05-11?$0.00May 17, 18:59 UTC
- REDEEMWill Athletic Club win on 2026-05-10?$0.00May 17, 18:59 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: Real Sociedad de Fútbol (-1.5)$0.00May 17, 18:59 UTC
- REDEEMExact Score: FC Barcelona 3 - 1 Real Madrid CF?$0.00May 17, 18:59 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: Levante UD (-1.5)$0.00May 17, 18:59 UTC
- REDEEMWill Trump say "Tariff" during events with Xi Jinping?$0.00May 17, 18:59 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Real Sociedad de Fútbol win on 2026-05-17?$24.97May 17, 18:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Real Sporting de Gijón (-1.5)$20.55May 17, 18:34 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Trump say "Iran" during events with Xi Jinping?$0.44May 17, 18:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Athletic Club win on 2026-05-17?$30.54May 17, 18:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Levante UD vs. RCD Mallorca end in a draw?$20.46May 17, 18:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Real Madrid CF (-1.5)$20.44May 17, 16:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Sociedad de Fútbol win on 2026-05-17?$50.90May 17, 16:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYAntoine Griezmann: Anytime Goalscorer$30.51May 17, 16:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - May 17, 8:35AM-8:40AM ET$5.30May 17, 12:39 UTC
- TRADESELLCoco Gauff vs. Elina Svitolina: Total Sets O/U 2.5$45.40May 16, 20:11 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 38
- Avg trade size
- $37.70
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 9, 18:18 UTC
- Last active
- May 17, 18:59 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".