Bossy-Farmer
0xae59f2c251f4de68bce14daf7f0826a0cb5fc97f
Wallet digest
Activity score
30/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
16
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-3.1K
Realised
$-165.25
Win rate
0%
3 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 16- YES
Will Aston Villa FC win on 2026-01-07?
1013 shares @ 42.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 7, 2026$0.00
$-425.37
- YES
Will Manchester City FC win on 2026-01-01?
870 shares @ 69.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2026$0.00
$-600.00
- YES
Will FC Barcelona win on 2026-01-18?
817 shares @ 61.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 18, 2026$0.00
$-498.15
- NO
Epstein blackmail evidence released in 2025?
537 shares @ 21.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 31, 2025$0.00
$-112.93
- YES
Will Lille OSC win on 2026-01-16?
513 shares @ 3.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 16, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
- YES
Will Juventus FC win on 2026-01-17?
507 shares @ 45.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 17, 2026$0.00
$-231.43
- UNDER
SV Werder Bremen vs. Eintracht Frankfurt: O/U 3.5
500 shares @ 60.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 16, 2026$0.00
$-300.00
- YES
Will Elon Musk post 500-519 tweets from January 9 to January 16, 2026?
400 shares @ 25.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 16, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
- YES
Will Elon Musk post 540-559 tweets from December 30 to January 6, 2026?
388 shares @ 12.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 6, 2026$0.00
$-50.00
- YES
Will Arsenal FC win on 2026-01-17?
316 shares @ 63.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 17, 2026$0.00
$-200.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill FC Barcelona win on 2026-01-18?$498.15Jan 18, 18:28 UTC
- TRADESELLAston Villa FC vs. Everton FC: O/U 2.5$498.15Jan 18, 18:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYAston Villa FC vs. Everton FC: O/U 2.5$354.04Jan 18, 17:05 UTC
- TRADESELLAston Villa FC vs. Everton FC: O/U 2.5$354.04Jan 18, 17:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYAston Villa FC vs. Everton FC: O/U 2.5$235.83Jan 18, 11:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYAustralian Open Men's: Benjamin Bonzi vs Cameron Norrie$100.00Jan 18, 10:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Los Ratones vs Karmine Corp Blue (BO1)$100.00Jan 18, 09:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Juventus FC win on 2026-01-17?$20.00Jan 17, 21:20 UTC
- TRADESELLIowa State Cyclones vs. Cincinnati Bearcats$455.83Jan 17, 21:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Juventus FC win on 2026-01-17?$211.43Jan 17, 19:37 UTC
- TRADESELLUS strikes Iran by January 31, 2026?$211.43Jan 17, 19:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYIowa State Cyclones vs. Cincinnati Bearcats$246.40Jan 17, 19:31 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Logan Paul’s PSA 10 Pokémon Illustrator Sale Price be over $15 million?$246.40Jan 17, 19:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester United FC win on 2026-01-17?$45.29Jan 17, 13:54 UTC
- TRADESELLReal Madrid CF vs. Levante UD: O/U 3.5$5.67Jan 17, 12:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYReal Madrid CF vs. Levante UD: O/U 3.5$6.48Jan 17, 11:02 UTC
- TRADESELLNottingham Forest FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 4.5$46.10Jan 17, 10:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 4.5$47.17Jan 17, 10:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal FC win on 2026-01-17?$200.00Jan 17, 10:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Lille OSC win on 2026-01-16?$20.00Jan 16, 20:32 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 49
- Avg trade size
- $225.55
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 6, 13:58 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 18, 18:28 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 3 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".