Nonstop-Acetate
0xaf95df4f22ad8f41429146ccf8de2c12d4163a72
Wallet digest
Activity score
45/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-416.04
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Olympique Lyonnais win on 2025-11-02?$216.04Nov 2, 19:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYPump.fun all time high by December 31?$200.00Oct 31, 09:55 UTC
- TRADESELLRolex Paris Masters: Corentin Moutet vs Reilly Opelka$160.00Oct 28, 12:54 UTC
- TRADESELLWill the price of Bitcoin be between $112,000 and $114,000 on October 28?$110.56Oct 28, 12:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYRolex Paris Masters: Corentin Moutet vs Reilly Opelka$100.00Oct 28, 12:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be between $112,000 and $114,000 on October 28?$100.00Oct 28, 11:57 UTC
- TRADESELLAspinall vs. Gane$387.91Oct 25, 21:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYAspinall vs. Gane$190.00Oct 25, 09:56 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 8
- Avg trade size
- $183.06
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Oct 25, 09:56 UTC
- Last active
- Nov 2, 19:53 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".