Straight-Population
0xb0bfc6ea5bf1ab8abb71a2f37fe37316655d4fea
Wallet digest
Activity score
52/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$4.08
Total PnL
$-1.42
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADESELL$BTC dips below $40k before October?$0.73Sep 29, 02:52 UTC
- TRADESELLMetaMask airdrop by September 30?$0.04Sep 29, 02:47 UTC
- TRADESELL$BTC dips below $40k before October?$1.70Sep 29, 02:41 UTC
- TRADESELLMetaMask airdrop by September 30?$2.74Sep 29, 02:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hyperliquid launch a token in October?$1.00Sep 29, 02:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill $ETH hit $2000 or $4000 first?$2.00Sep 29, 02:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill $BTC reach 80k before October?$2.50Sep 29, 02:32 UTC
- TRADEBUY$BTC dips below $40k before October?$2.43Sep 29, 02:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYMetaMask airdrop by September 30?$2.78Sep 29, 02:31 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 9
- Avg trade size
- $1.77
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Sep 29, 02:31 UTC
- Last active
- Sep 29, 02:52 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".