Shallow-Pint
0xb0e90bba09146a866b29addb364bf174f8a551e4
Wallet digest
Activity score
63/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$1.22
Total PnL
$0.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Grigor Dimitrov win the 2025 French Open?$1.22May 23, 11:29 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Lee Jae-myung win more than 65% of the vote in the South Korea election?$1.22May 22, 12:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Lee Jae-myung win more than 65% of the vote in the South Korea election?$1.22May 21, 13:08 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Letitia James win the Democratic Primary for Mayor of New York City?$1.22May 19, 12:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Letitia James win the Democratic Primary for Mayor of New York City?$1.22May 18, 14:13 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Spain win Eurovision 2025?$1.23May 17, 09:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Spain win Eurovision 2025?$1.23May 16, 08:46 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 7
- Avg trade size
- $1.22
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 16, 08:46 UTC
- Last active
- May 23, 11:29 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".