Willing-Leave
0xb1eb2a1f7e5bbf44ac0f76e8f1282202db079b82
Wallet digest
Activity score
68/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
13
Open notional
$55.57
Total PnL
$-15.43
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 13- YES
Will PSG win the 2025–26 Champions League?
69 shares @ 58.0¢·now 57.5¢·exp May 31, 2026$39.66
$-0.34
- OVER
Paris Saint-Germain FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 4.5
38 shares @ 13.0¢·now 12.5¢·exp May 30, 2026$4.81
$-0.19
- YES
Ousmane Dembele: Anytime Goalscorer
13 shares @ 39.0¢·now 33.5¢·exp May 30, 2026$4.29
$-0.71
- YES
Exact Score: Paris Saint-Germain FC 3 - 2 Arsenal FC?
114 shares @ 4.4¢·now 3.5¢·exp May 30, 2026$4.00
$-1.00
- YES
Exact Score: Paris Saint-Germain FC 3 - 1 Arsenal FC?
63 shares @ 8.0¢·now 4.5¢·exp May 30, 2026$2.81
$-2.19
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 3:30AM-3:45AM ET
31 shares @ 6.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 7, 2026$0.00
$-2.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - May 6, 2:15PM-2:20PM ET
7 shares @ 15.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 6, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 3:20AM-3:25AM ET
6 shares @ 34.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 7, 2026$0.00
$-2.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 4:30AM-4:45AM ET
5 shares @ 22.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 7, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 4:20AM-4:25AM ET
4 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 7, 2026$0.00
$-2.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill PSG win the 2025–26 Champions League?$20.25May 27, 18:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYOusmane Dembele: Anytime Goalscorer$5.09May 27, 18:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYParis Saint-Germain FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 4.5$5.13May 27, 18:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Paris Saint-Germain FC 3 - 2 Arsenal FC?$5.14May 27, 18:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Paris Saint-Germain FC 3 - 1 Arsenal FC?$5.14May 27, 18:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill PSG win the 2025–26 Champions League?$20.25May 7, 09:59 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 3:15AM-3:30AM ET$0.00May 7, 08:51 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 3:25AM-3:30AM ET$0.00May 7, 08:51 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 4:30AM-4:35AM ET$0.00May 7, 08:50 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 4:40AM-4:45AM ET$0.00May 7, 08:50 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 4:40AM-4:45AM ET$1.69May 7, 08:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 4:40AM-4:45AM ET$1.04May 7, 08:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 4:40AM-4:45AM ET$1.03May 7, 08:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 4:30AM-4:45AM ET$1.05May 7, 08:36 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 4:30AM-4:35AM ET$1.79May 7, 08:35 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 3:50AM-3:55AM ET$0.00May 7, 08:32 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 4:00AM-4:15AM ET$0.00May 7, 08:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 4:30AM-4:35AM ET$1.04May 7, 08:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 4:30AM-4:35AM ET$1.03May 7, 08:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 4:25AM-4:30AM ET$1.03May 7, 08:25 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 33
- Avg trade size
- $2.70
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 7, 07:10 UTC
- Last active
- May 27, 18:07 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".