Decisive-Alcove
0xb2722348c9cd4d60fe1404edff84b514ca6dd4a6
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
200
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-1.2K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 200- OLIMPIA MILANO
Monaco vs. Olimpia Milano
82 shares @ 44.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 24, 2026$0.00
$-36.21
- FC BAYERN MUNCHEN
Zalgiris Kaunas vs. FC Bayern Munchen
61 shares @ 25.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 24, 2026$0.00
$-15.57
- UNDER
Córdoba CF vs. CD Mirandés: O/U 2.5
25 shares @ 42.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 27, 2026$0.00
$-10.55
- YES
Will Newcastle United Jets FC win on 2026-04-02?
25 shares @ 35.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 2, 2026$0.00
$-8.74
- ANADOLU EFES
Barcelona vs. Anadolu Efes
25 shares @ 26.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 24, 2026$0.00
$-6.43
- OVER
Stade de Reims vs. US Boulogne Côte d'Opale: O/U 2.5
24 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$0.00
$-11.45
- UNDER
Spurs vs. Warriors: O/U 227.5
24 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 2, 2026$0.00
$-11.38
- SAN DIEGO PADRES
San Diego Padres vs. Pittsburgh Pirates
23 shares @ 42.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 14, 2026$0.00
$-9.85
- UNDER
Central Coast Mariners FC vs. Brisbane Roar FC: O/U 2.5
23 shares @ 45.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 10, 2026$0.00
$-10.47
- UNDER
Pacers vs. Hornets: O/U 234.5
23 shares @ 49.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 3, 2026$0.00
$-11.36
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill Arsenal FC vs. Sporting CP end in a draw?$8.70Apr 16, 07:35 UTC
- REDEEMTampa Bay Rays vs. Chicago White Sox$12.24Apr 16, 07:35 UTC
- REDEEMAFC Wimbledon vs. Stockport County FC: O/U 2.5$14.70Apr 16, 07:35 UTC
- REDEEMHuddersfield Town AFC vs. Cardiff City FC: O/U 2.5$12.07Apr 15, 16:49 UTC
- REDEEMWill CD Coquimbo Unido win on 2026-04-14?$12.36Apr 15, 14:33 UTC
- REDEEMSouthampton FC vs. Blackburn Rovers FC: O/U 2.5$12.58Apr 15, 14:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Cruzeiro EC vs. CD Universidad Católica end in a draw?$2.29Apr 15, 10:30 UTC
- REDEEMArizona Diamondbacks vs. Baltimore Orioles$18.10Apr 15, 05:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal FC vs. Sporting CP end in a draw?$1.96Apr 15, 05:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Fluminense FC vs. CS Independiente Rivadavia end in a draw?$1.89Apr 15, 03:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill SC Corinthians Paulista vs. Independiente Santa Fe end in a draw?$2.61Apr 15, 03:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYNew York Mets vs. Los Angeles Dodgers$3.16Apr 15, 01:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYJets vs. Utah$3.41Apr 15, 01:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYSeattle Mariners vs. San Diego Padres$5.93Apr 15, 00:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYTexas Rangers vs. Athletics$6.05Apr 14, 23:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYColorado Rockies vs. Houston Astros$4.14Apr 14, 23:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYTampa Bay Rays vs. Chicago White Sox$6.58Apr 14, 22:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill AFC Wimbledon vs. Stockport County FC end in a draw?$2.74Apr 14, 22:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYCleveland Guardians vs. St. Louis Cardinals$7.08Apr 14, 21:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYAFC Wimbledon vs. Stockport County FC: O/U 2.5$7.46Apr 14, 21:45 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 41
- Avg trade size
- $5.02
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 13, 12:30 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 16, 07:35 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".