Grotesque-Excursion
0xb27a1a16822edd18db387ef4cc1cf2d450a47d3f
Activity score
85/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$94.50
Total PnL
$0.05
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- REDEEMTotal Kills Over/Under 26.5 in Game 1?$80.0016m ago
- REDEEMTotal Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 1?$376.1716m ago
- REDEEMTotal Kills Over/Under 25.5 in Game 1?$443.4216m ago
- REDEEMTotal Kills Over/Under 29.5 in Game 1?$555.0016m ago
- REDEEMTotal Kills Over/Under 28.5 in Game 1?$570.2416m ago
- TRADEBUYGames Total: O/U 2.5$94.4633m ago
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 26.5 in Game 1?$79.923h ago
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 25.5 in Game 1?$442.993h ago
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 1?$375.813h ago
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 28.5 in Game 1?$569.693h ago
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 29.5 in Game 1?$554.463h ago
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs FaZe (BO3) - BLAST Rivals Playoffs$3.7K3h ago
- REDEEMGame Handicap: AL (-1.5) vs Invictus Gaming (+1.5)$268.1215h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs FaZe (BO3) - BLAST Rivals Playoffs$3.7K16h ago
- REDEEMValorant: EDward Gaming vs Dragon Ranger Gaming (BO3) - VCT China Playoffs$2.0K17h ago
- TRADEBUYValorant: EDward Gaming vs Dragon Ranger Gaming (BO3) - VCT China Playoffs$153.2321h ago
- TRADEBUYValorant: EDward Gaming vs Dragon Ranger Gaming (BO3) - VCT China Playoffs$9.9921h ago
- TRADEBUYValorant: EDward Gaming vs Dragon Ranger Gaming (BO3) - VCT China Playoffs$172.5121h ago
- TRADEBUYValorant: EDward Gaming vs Dragon Ranger Gaming (BO3) - VCT China Playoffs$10.2421h ago
- TRADEBUYValorant: EDward Gaming vs Dragon Ranger Gaming (BO3) - VCT China Playoffs$14.4821h ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 40
- Avg trade size
- $244.04
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 2d ago
- Last active
- 16m ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".