0xb2cbf3389906f0cadb8d727bc166cfcc818b2bad
0xb2cbf3389906f0cadb8d727bc166cfcc818b2bad
Wallet digest
Activity score
90/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
10
Open notional
$2.4K
Total PnL
$19.36
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- 9Z
Counter-Strike: MIBR vs 9z - Map 2 Winner
2118 shares @ 99.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jul 5, 2026$2.1K
$20.12
- NO
Will L1GA TEAM win the EWC Dota 2 Tournament
103 shares @ 98.8¢·now 98.8¢·exp Jan 1, 1970$101.45
$-0.04
- NO
Will TEAM VISION Win The International 2026?
42 shares @ 80.0¢·now 84.0¢·exp Jan 1, 1970$35.42
$1.69
- NO
Will Team Nemesis win the EWC Dota 2 Tournament
30 shares @ 99.0¢·now 99.7¢·exp Jan 1, 1970$29.89
$0.20
- NO
Will Sentinels win the EWC League of Legends Tournament
20 shares @ 99.0¢·now 98.0¢·exp Jan 1, 1970$19.59
$-0.21
- NO
Will GAM Esports win the EWC League of Legends Tournament
20 shares @ 99.0¢·now 97.6¢·exp Jan 1, 1970$19.52
$-0.28
- NO
Will TYLOO Win the XSE Pro League
19 shares @ 90.0¢·now 78.5¢·exp Jan 1, 1970$14.91
$-2.19
- NO
Will FURIA win the EWC League of Legends Tournament
13 shares @ 99.0¢·now 90.5¢·exp Jan 1, 1970$11.89
$-1.12
- NO
Will MIBR.LOS win the EWC League of Legends Tournament
10 shares @ 99.0¢·now 98.0¢·exp Jan 1, 1970$9.93
$-0.11
- NO
Will Team Spirit Win The International 2026?
7 shares @ 70.0¢·now 88.5¢·exp Jan 1, 1970$6.20
$1.29
Recent activity
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: MIBR vs 9z - Map 1 Winner$115.84Jul 5, 09:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: MIBR vs 9z - Map 2 Winner$11.88Jul 5, 08:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: MIBR vs 9z - Map 2 Winner$11.25Jul 5, 08:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: MIBR vs 9z - Map 2 Winner$97.05Jul 5, 08:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: MIBR vs 9z - Map 2 Winner$204.12Jul 5, 08:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: MIBR vs 9z - Map 2 Winner$145.73Jul 5, 08:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: MIBR vs 9z - Map 2 Winner$56.33Jul 5, 08:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: MIBR vs 9z - Map 2 Winner$94.23Jul 5, 08:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: MIBR vs 9z - Map 2 Winner$11.63Jul 5, 08:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: MIBR vs 9z - Map 2 Winner$11.04Jul 5, 08:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: MIBR vs 9z - Map 2 Winner$35.70Jul 5, 08:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: MIBR vs 9z - Map 2 Winner$5.00Jul 5, 08:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: MIBR vs 9z - Map 2 Winner$114.23Jul 5, 08:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: MIBR vs 9z - Map 2 Winner$866.12Jul 5, 08:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: MIBR vs 9z - Map 2 Winner$5.78Jul 5, 08:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: MIBR vs 9z - Map 2 Winner$426.39Jul 5, 08:51 UTC
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: MIBR vs 9z - Map 1 Winner$810.00Jul 5, 08:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: MIBR vs 9z - Map 1 Winner$54.61Jul 5, 07:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: MIBR vs 9z - Map 1 Winner$4.95Jul 5, 07:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: MIBR vs 9z - Map 1 Winner$1.12Jul 5, 07:17 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentLedger volume
$29.7K
Trades
1
Buy share
22%
Window
Jun 24, 20:40 UTC → Jul 4, 11:17 UTC
- SELLCounter-Strike: FaZe vs Sinners - Map 1 Winner$7.5K@100¢Jul 3, 13:47 UTC
Wallet edge sanity
Do not mirror
0/100Treat this wallet as noise/context only until resolved history, copy-risk, and liquidity checks improve.
Win rate is hidden until at least 3 closed markets exist for this wallet.
Large size, concentration, or thin history makes this wallet unsafe to imitate.
Many positions were entered near obvious prices, which can inflate win rate while hiding tail risk.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
Only 0 closed markets; headline win rate is intentionally hidden.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Blocked
0/100Wallet flow is blocked as an intelligence signal until hard failures are fixed.
Wallet activity exists, but copy-risk is too high for interpretation.
Too few closed markets. Do not infer edge from open PnL or leaderboard rank.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$7.5K
1 trades
30d volume
$7.5K
1 trades
Buy share
22%
Sample
limited
4 ledger trades
Top market concentration
Counter-Strike: BIG vs NIP - Map 2 Winner
$8.9K · 30% of recorded whale volume
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 46
- Avg trade size
- $423.52
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jul 4, 17:45 UTC
- Last active
- Jul 5, 09:18 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.