0xb53c2975c221fa37906c43a8eaf9f5d2ebedeb0c
0xb53c2975c221fa37906c43a8eaf9f5d2ebedeb0c
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
62
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-7.6K
Realised
$5.68
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 62- UNDER
OGC Nice vs. Go Ahead Eagles: O/U 2.5
600 shares @ 38.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 22, 2026$0.00
$-228.00
- NO
Will Rangers FC win on 2026-01-22?
600 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 22, 2026$0.00
$-300.00
- NO
Will GNK Dinamo Zagreb win on 2026-01-22?
600 shares @ 43.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 22, 2026$0.00
$-258.00
- NO
Will PAOK win on 2026-01-22?
600 shares @ 61.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 22, 2026$0.00
$-367.91
- NO
Will Feyenoord Rotterdam win on 2026-01-22?
600 shares @ 26.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 22, 2026$0.00
$-156.00
- UNDER
OGC Nice vs. Go Ahead Eagles: O/U 3.5
600 shares @ 61.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 22, 2026$0.00
$-366.00
- OVER
Ferencvárosi TC vs. Panathinaikós AO: O/U 2.5
600 shares @ 49.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 22, 2026$0.00
$-294.00
- UNDER
Olympique de Marseille vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 2.5
600 shares @ 39.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 21, 2026$0.00
$-234.00
- OVER
BSC Young Boys vs. Olympique Lyonnais: O/U 2.5
600 shares @ 57.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 22, 2026$0.00
$-341.99
- OVER
SC Braga vs. Nottingham Forest FC: O/U 2.5
600 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 22, 2026$0.00
$-288.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMXRP Up or Down - January 26, 9PM ET$7.00Jan 27, 05:38 UTC
- REDEEMEthereum Up or Down - January 26, 10:45PM-11:00PM ET$11.37Jan 27, 05:38 UTC
- REDEEMSolana Up or Down - January 26, 10PM ET$16.75Jan 27, 05:38 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - January 26, 10:45PM-11:00PM ET$24.04Jan 27, 05:38 UTC
- REDEEMEthereum Up or Down - January 26, 10PM ET$36.24Jan 27, 05:38 UTC
- REDEEMXRP Up or Down - January 26, 10PM ET$55.51Jan 27, 05:38 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - January 26, 10PM ET$89.87Jan 27, 05:38 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - January 26, 9PM ET$135.06Jan 27, 05:38 UTC
- REDEEMSolana Up or Down - January 26, 9PM ET$147.22Jan 27, 05:38 UTC
- REDEEMEthereum Up or Down - January 26, 10:30PM-10:45PM ET$30.70Jan 27, 03:51 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - January 26, 10:30PM-10:45PM ET$157.11Jan 27, 03:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - January 26, 10:45PM-11:00PM ET$3.59Jan 27, 03:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 26, 10:45PM-11:00PM ET$1.62Jan 27, 03:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 26, 10:45PM-11:00PM ET$5.69Jan 27, 03:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 26, 10:45PM-11:00PM ET$5.42Jan 27, 03:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 26, 10:45PM-11:00PM ET$1.90Jan 27, 03:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 26, 10:45PM-11:00PM ET$1.80Jan 27, 03:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 26, 10:45PM-11:00PM ET$2.15Jan 27, 03:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - January 26, 10PM ET$2.17Jan 27, 03:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - January 26, 10:45PM-11:00PM ET$2.24Jan 27, 03:47 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 39
- Avg trade size
- $3.17
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 27, 03:38 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 27, 05:38 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".