Plump-Abrogation
0xb6b8b20aa4ee4a466770fb0b2bb124bd5f159e43
Wallet digest
Activity score
87/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
29
Open notional
$103.50
Total PnL
$2.80
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 29- 76ERS
Spread: 76ers (-2.5)
11 shares @ 51.5¢·now 100.0¢·exp Apr 3, 2026$11.48
$5.57
- UNDER
San Diego Padres vs. Boston Red Sox: O/U 8.5
11 shares @ 53.5¢·now 100.0¢·exp Apr 3, 2026$11.06
$5.14
- KNICKS
Spread: Knicks (-16.5)
7 shares @ 42.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Apr 3, 2026$7.02
$4.07
- NEW YORK YANKEES
Spread: New York Yankees (-1.5)
7 shares @ 42.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Apr 3, 2026$7.02
$4.07
- ROMAN ANDRES BURRUCHAGA
US Men's Clay Court Championships: Learner Tien vs Roman Andres Burruchaga
7 shares @ 44.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Apr 10, 2026$6.70
$3.75
- KNICKS
Spread: Knicks (-15.5)
7 shares @ 45.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Apr 3, 2026$6.56
$3.61
- NO
Will SC Bastia win on 2026-04-03?
7 shares @ 46.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Apr 3, 2026$6.52
$3.52
- BETBOOM TEAM
Counter-Strike: BetBoom Team vs Heroic (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 1 Playoffs
6 shares @ 47.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Apr 3, 2026$6.28
$3.33
- CELTICS
Spread: Celtics (-17.5)
6 shares @ 50.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$5.91
$2.96
- UNDER
Bulls vs. Knicks: O/U 237.5
6 shares @ 51.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Apr 3, 2026$5.80
$2.84
Recent activity
- REDEEMCharlton Athletic FC vs. Bristol City FC: O/U 2.5$0.00Apr 3, 22:04 UTC
- REDEEMWill Middlesbrough FC win on 2026-04-03?$0.00Apr 3, 22:04 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bristol City FC win on 2026-04-03?$0.00Apr 3, 22:04 UTC
- REDEEMWill Leicester City FC win on 2026-04-03?$6.00Apr 3, 22:04 UTC
- REDEEMOxford United FC vs. Hull City AFC: O/U 2.5$7.89Apr 3, 22:03 UTC
- REDEEMWill Sheffield United FC win on 2026-04-03?$6.38Apr 3, 22:03 UTC
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: K27 vs 100 Thieves (BO3) - PGL Astana: European Closed Qualifier Playoffs$3.55Apr 3, 22:03 UTC
- REDEEMCharlton Athletic FC vs. Bristol City FC: O/U 1.5$4.23Apr 3, 22:03 UTC
- REDEEMWill West Bromwich Albion FC win on 2026-04-03?$5.45Apr 3, 22:03 UTC
- REDEEMOxford United FC vs. Hull City AFC: O/U 3.5$0.00Apr 3, 22:03 UTC
- REDEEMBucharest Open: Alex Molcan vs Mariano Navone$5.91Apr 3, 22:02 UTC
- REDEEMMiddlesbrough FC vs. Millwall FC: O/U 3.5$3.49Apr 3, 18:10 UTC
- REDEEMMenorca: Jonas Forejtek vs Roberto Carballes Baena$0.00Apr 3, 18:10 UTC
- REDEEMBucharest Open: Daniel Altmaier vs Dino Prizmic$0.00Apr 3, 18:09 UTC
- REDEEMGrand Prix Hassan II: Alexandre Muller vs Rafael Jodar$0.00Apr 3, 18:09 UTC
- REDEEMFujian Sturgeons vs. Qingdao Eagles$5.02Apr 3, 18:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS Men's Clay Court Championships: Learner Tien vs Roman Andres Burruchaga$3.00Apr 3, 17:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: New York Yankees (-1.5)$3.00Apr 3, 17:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill SC Bastia win on 2026-04-03?$3.00Apr 3, 17:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYToronto Blue Jays vs. Chicago White Sox$3.00Apr 3, 17:14 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 33
- Avg trade size
- $2.97
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 3, 14:32 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 3, 22:04 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".