Striped-Hotdog
0xb702a0ac9fb9f016b82764a302c330f44cb6b2a2
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
13
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-547.76
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 13- YES
Will Trump visit China by April 30?
1054 shares @ 6.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$0.00
$-71.00
- YES
Will Manchester City FC win on 2026-03-04?
265 shares @ 68.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 4, 2026$0.00
$-180.00
- OVER
Hamburger SV vs. Bayer 04 Leverkusen: O/U 2.5
167 shares @ 60.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 13, 2026$0.00
$-100.20
- YES
Will RCD Espanyol de Barcelona win on 2026-03-01?
107 shares @ 28.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 1, 2026$0.00
$-30.00
- YES
Will Macarthur FC win on 2026-02-25?
97 shares @ 41.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 25, 2026$0.00
$-40.00
- YES
Will Arsenal FC vs. Chelsea FC end in a draw?
84 shares @ 9.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 1, 2026$0.00
$-7.56
- YES
Will Girona FC vs. RC Celta de Vigo end in a draw?
69 shares @ 29.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 1, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
- YES
Will Daejeon Hana Citizen FC win on 2026-03-02?
65 shares @ 31.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 2, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
- YES
Will Racing Club de Lens win on 2026-02-27?
38 shares @ 32.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 27, 2026$0.00
$-12.00
- OVER
Central Coast Mariners FC vs. Newcastle United Jets FC: O/U 1.5
36 shares @ 55.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 28, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Trump visit China by April 30?$20.00Mar 26, 00:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Trump visit China by April 30?$51.00Mar 23, 01:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYHamburger SV vs. Bayer 04 Leverkusen: O/U 2.5$96.42Mar 4, 16:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYHamburger SV vs. Bayer 04 Leverkusen: O/U 2.5$3.78Mar 4, 15:30 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Arsenal FC win on 2026-03-04?$100.00Mar 4, 15:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal FC win on 2026-03-04?$100.00Mar 4, 12:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester City FC win on 2026-03-04?$180.00Mar 4, 12:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Macarthur FC win on 2026-02-25?$20.00Mar 4, 09:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Macarthur FC win on 2026-02-25?$20.00Mar 4, 08:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYPelicans vs. Lakers: O/U 240.5$13.00Mar 4, 03:19 UTC
- REDEEMWill Como 1907 vs. FC Internazionale Milano end in a draw?$112.90Mar 4, 01:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Como 1907 vs. FC Internazionale Milano end in a draw?$35.00Mar 3, 14:37 UTC
- REDEEMBirmingham City FC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 2.5$55.56Mar 3, 00:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYBirmingham City FC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 2.5$30.00Mar 2, 10:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Daejeon Hana Citizen FC win on 2026-03-02?$20.00Mar 2, 06:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYDaejeon Hana Citizen FC vs. FC Anyang: O/U 1.5$14.00Mar 2, 06:17 UTC
- REDEEMWill RC Celta de Vigo win on 2026-03-01?$62.50Mar 2, 03:58 UTC
- REDEEMWill Manchester United FC win on 2026-03-01?$151.52Mar 1, 23:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal FC vs. Chelsea FC end in a draw?$7.56Mar 1, 18:09 UTC
- REDEEMUS Cremonese vs. AC Milan: O/U 1.5$0.00Mar 1, 16:34 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 34
- Avg trade size
- $35.99
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 27, 09:21 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 26, 00:51 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".