Jumpy-Messy
0xb7401b4c0c80474eaa52799a0f4f97fa7afb582d
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
15
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-12.3K
Realised
$168.22
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 15- OVER
AS Roma vs. Cagliari Calcio: O/U 2.5
4550 shares @ 44.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 9, 2026$0.00
$-2.0K
- OVER
Manchester City FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 3.5
3429 shares @ 41.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 11, 2026$0.00
$-1.4K
- OVER
Manchester City FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 4.5
2760 shares @ 21.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 11, 2026$0.00
$-586.45
- OVER
AA Estudiantes vs. CS Independiente Rivadavia: O/U 1.5
2437 shares @ 42.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 10, 2026$0.00
$-1.0K
- OVER
SSC Napoli vs. Como 1907: O/U 2.5
2399 shares @ 54.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 10, 2026$0.00
$-1.3K
- OVER
West Ham United FC vs. Manchester United FC: O/U 2.5
2392 shares @ 44.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 10, 2026$0.00
$-1.1K
- OVER
Atalanta BC vs. US Cremonese: O/U 3.5
1900 shares @ 44.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 9, 2026$0.00
$-836.99
- 1WIN
Dota 2: 1win vs AVULUS (BO3) - DreamLeague Division 2 Playoffs
1639 shares @ 61.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 11, 2026$0.00
$-999.99
- OVER
Fenerbahçe SK vs. Gençlerbirliği SK: O/U 4.5
1600 shares @ 54.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 9, 2026$0.00
$-876.00
- OVER
EC Vitória vs. CR Flamengo: O/U 3.5
1559 shares @ 24.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 11, 2026$0.00
$-374.06
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYBrentford FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$246.43Feb 12, 21:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYBrentford FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$76.87Feb 12, 21:36 UTC
- TRADESELLManchester City FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 3.5$322.77Feb 11, 20:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 4.5$18.87Feb 11, 19:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 4.5$0.63Feb 11, 19:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 4.5$0.28Feb 11, 19:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 4.5$0.63Feb 11, 19:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 3.5$60.59Feb 11, 19:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 3.5$453.60Feb 11, 19:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 4.5$157.60Feb 11, 19:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 3.5$33.33Feb 11, 19:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 3.5$38.09Feb 11, 19:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 4.5$202.00Feb 11, 19:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 3.5$19.81Feb 11, 19:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 3.5$66.67Feb 11, 19:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 3.5$1.24Feb 11, 19:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 3.5$4.66Feb 11, 19:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 3.5$2.00Feb 11, 19:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 4.5$192.00Feb 11, 19:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 3.5$171.58Feb 11, 19:33 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 49
- Avg trade size
- $102.82
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 10, 22:20 UTC
- Last active
- Feb 12, 21:36 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".