Taut-Scientist
0xbb20fd9abf8212536c4d1a4553167e6a8b7da151
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
12
Open notional
$0.04
Total PnL
$-651.25
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 12- UNDER
Wong vs. Prado: Match O/U 22.5
88 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 29, 2026$0.04
$-42.37
- UNDER
FC Barcelona vs. Real Betis Balompié: O/U 3.5
300 shares @ 47.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-141.00
- YES
Will Liverpool FC win on 2026-05-17?
250 shares @ 38.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-95.00
- NO
Will Aston Villa FC win on 2026-05-20?
244 shares @ 41.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$0.00
$-100.04
- OVER
Leeds United FC vs. Brighton & Hove Albion FC: O/U 2.5
195 shares @ 52.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-101.39
- ARSENAL FC
Spread: Arsenal FC (-2.5)
160 shares @ 51.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$0.00
$-81.60
- UNDER 2.5
Mariano Navone vs. Hamad Medjedovic: Total Sets O/U 2.5
150 shares @ 34.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$0.00
$-51.00
- NO
Will FC Barcelona win on 2026-05-10?
85 shares @ 41.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 10, 2026$0.00
$-34.85
- SSC NAPOLI
Spread: SSC Napoli (-1.5)
3 shares @ 35.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 11, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will Rayo Vallecano de Madrid win on 2026-05-11?
2 shares @ 44.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 11, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
Recent activity
- TRADESELLRoland Garros, Qualification ATP: Coleman Wong vs Juan Carlos Prado$99.90May 21, 15:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYWong vs. Prado: Match O/U 22.5$42.42May 21, 11:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros, Qualification ATP: Coleman Wong vs Juan Carlos Prado$45.00May 21, 11:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros, Qualification ATP: Coleman Wong vs Juan Carlos Prado$15.00May 21, 11:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Aston Villa FC win on 2026-05-20?$100.04May 20, 14:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Arsenal FC (-2.5)$82.80May 18, 19:00 UTC
- MAKER_REBATE$1.51May 18, 00:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Barcelona vs. Real Betis Balompié: O/U 3.5$141.00May 17, 18:50 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Manchester United FC win on 2026-05-17?$324.67May 17, 18:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeeds United FC vs. Brighton & Hove Albion FC: O/U 2.5$39.21May 17, 13:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeeds United FC vs. Brighton & Hove Albion FC: O/U 2.5$2.65May 17, 13:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeeds United FC vs. Brighton & Hove Albion FC: O/U 2.5$2.65May 17, 13:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeeds United FC vs. Brighton & Hove Albion FC: O/U 2.5$2.71May 17, 13:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeeds United FC vs. Brighton & Hove Albion FC: O/U 2.5$54.17May 17, 13:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester United FC win on 2026-05-17?$195.00May 17, 09:58 UTC
- TRADESELLInternazionali BNL d'Italia: Coco Gauff vs Elina Svitolina$63.00May 16, 18:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia: Coco Gauff vs Elina Svitolina$62.00May 16, 18:26 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Chelsea FC win on 2026-05-16?$87.78May 16, 15:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Chelsea FC win on 2026-05-16?$8.99May 16, 15:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Chelsea FC win on 2026-05-16?$0.76May 16, 15:12 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 46
- Avg trade size
- $64.99
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 11, 18:40 UTC
- Last active
- May 21, 15:52 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".