Rotten-Developing
0xbb286f1ce2c883c4bc3b73853e75efd0560ad3dc
Wallet digest
Activity score
86/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$28.89
Total PnL
$6.89
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill there be exactly 0 earthquakes of magnitude 7.0 or higher worldwide by December 31?$2.00Nov 12, 08:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Russia recapture territory in Kucheriv Yar by November 30?$20.00Nov 3, 09:31 UTC
- REDEEMHasanAbi arrested by October 31?$5.06Nov 3, 09:28 UTC
- TRADESELLWill the Christian Union win the most seats in the 2025 Netherlands parliamentary election?$78.71Oct 27, 07:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Christian Union win the most seats in the 2025 Netherlands parliamentary election?$78.71Oct 27, 03:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYHasanAbi arrested by October 31?$5.00Oct 27, 03:02 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 5
- Avg trade size
- $36.88
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Oct 27, 03:02 UTC
- Last active
- Nov 12, 08:56 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".