Trusty-Vogue
0xbbe887400fa035a8372728f15df970ab56270fed
Wallet digest
Activity score
54/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
200
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-42.1K
Realised
$-49.06
Win rate
60%
40 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 200- NO
Will Barcelona win on 2025-11-09?
1855 shares @ 40.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 9, 2025$0.00
$-746.77
- NO
Will AS Roma win on 2025-11-09?
1251 shares @ 23.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 9, 2025$0.00
$-295.69
- YES
Will Crvena Zvezda win on 2025-10-02?
1200 shares @ 0.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 2, 2025$0.00
$-7.40
- NO
Will FC Bayern München win on 2025-11-04?
1184 shares @ 31.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 4, 2025$0.00
$-378.07
- NO
Will Liverpool FC win on 2025-10-22?
1150 shares @ 44.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 22, 2025$0.00
$-510.44
- NO
Will FC Midtjylland win on 2025-11-06?
1077 shares @ 47.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 6, 2025$0.00
$-512.24
- NO
Will Arsenal FC win on 2025-11-04?
1035 shares @ 25.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 4, 2025$0.00
$-260.43
- NO
Will Japan win on 2025-10-14?
1035 shares @ 48.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 14, 2025$0.00
$-498.95
- NO
Will Inter Miami CF win on 2025-10-18?
1000 shares @ 60.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 18, 2025$0.00
$-605.58
- NO
Will Athletic Club win on 2025-10-22?
1000 shares @ 34.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 22, 2025$0.00
$-340.63
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill CA Mineiro win on 2025-11-12?$70.00Nov 13, 10:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CA Mineiro win on 2025-11-12?$4.50Nov 13, 00:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CA Mineiro win on 2025-11-12?$4.25Nov 13, 00:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CA Mineiro win on 2025-11-12?$7.40Nov 12, 23:35 UTC
- REDEEMWill Gimnasia y Esgrima de La Plata vs. CA Vélez Sarsfield end in a draw?$7.41Nov 11, 13:17 UTC
- REDEEMWill CA Vélez Sarsfield win on 2025-11-10?$24.39Nov 11, 13:17 UTC
- REDEEMWill AA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Belgrano end in a draw?$25.00Nov 11, 13:17 UTC
- REDEEMCD Riestra vs. CA Independiente: O/U 1.5$44.71Nov 11, 13:17 UTC
- REDEEMGimnasia y Esgrima de La Plata vs. CA Vélez Sarsfield: Both Teams to Score$45.00Nov 11, 13:17 UTC
- REDEEMWill CD Riestra vs. CA Independiente end in a draw?$74.99Nov 11, 13:17 UTC
- REDEEMWill CA Central Córdoba win on 2025-11-10?$75.00Nov 11, 13:17 UTC
- REDEEMWill CD Riestra win on 2025-11-10?$172.85Nov 11, 13:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CA Central Córdoba win on 2025-11-10?$18.00Nov 11, 01:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill AA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Belgrano end in a draw?$21.25Nov 11, 01:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CA Central Córdoba win on 2025-11-10?$17.25Nov 11, 00:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CA Central Córdoba win on 2025-11-10?$16.25Nov 11, 00:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CD Riestra vs. CA Independiente end in a draw?$1.44Nov 10, 23:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CD Riestra vs. CA Independiente end in a draw?$1.00Nov 10, 23:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CD Riestra vs. CA Independiente end in a draw?$1.44Nov 10, 23:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CD Riestra vs. CA Independiente end in a draw?$0.24Nov 10, 23:47 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 41
- Avg trade size
- $7.16
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 10, 22:08 UTC
- Last active
- Nov 13, 10:07 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 40 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".