Buttery-Treatment
0xbca0b22982273b3c6590c363e78cf61f357dd7a0
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
196
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-189.3K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 196- YES
Will Getafe CF vs. Real Betis Balompié end in a draw?
21034 shares @ 9.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 7, 2026$0.00
$-1.9K
- OVER
National Bank of Egypt Club vs. Pyramids FC: O/U 1.5
9693 shares @ 51.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 9, 2026$0.00
$-5.0K
- OVER
CD Tondela vs. Rio Ave FC: O/U 1.5
9147 shares @ 25.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 9, 2026$0.00
$-2.3K
- OVER
Philadelphia Union vs. San Jose Earthquakes: O/U 1.5
8890 shares @ 45.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 8, 2026$0.00
$-4.0K
- OVER
CD Riestra vs. CA Platense: O/U 2.5
8480 shares @ 23.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 2, 2026$0.00
$-2.0K
- OVER
St. Louis City SC vs. Seattle Sounders FC: O/U 1.5
6700 shares @ 45.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 8, 2026$0.00
$-3.0K
- OVER
Querétaro FC vs. CF América: O/U 3.5
6600 shares @ 37.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 8, 2026$0.00
$-2.4K
- OVER
Alanyaspor vs. Gençlerbirliği SK: O/U 2.5
6534 shares @ 29.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 9, 2026$0.00
$-1.9K
- OVER
Boyacá Chicó FC vs. Deportivo Pereira: O/U 1.5
6181 shares @ 25.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 2, 2026$0.00
$-1.5K
- OVER
El Gouna SC vs. El Masry SC: O/U 2.5
6027 shares @ 32.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 10, 2026$0.00
$-1.9K
Recent activity
- MAKER_REBATE$37.28Apr 8, 01:01 UTC
- REDEEMAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Banfield: O/U 4.5$4.6KApr 7, 06:11 UTC
- REDEEMAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Banfield: O/U 2.5$4.8KApr 7, 06:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Banfield: O/U 4.5$5.88Apr 6, 23:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Banfield: O/U 4.5$44.67Apr 6, 23:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Banfield: O/U 4.5$1.59Apr 6, 23:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Banfield: O/U 4.5$8.24Apr 6, 23:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Banfield: O/U 4.5$237.88Apr 6, 23:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Banfield: O/U 4.5$79.89Apr 6, 23:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Banfield: O/U 4.5$28.71Apr 6, 23:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Banfield: O/U 4.5$72.38Apr 6, 23:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Banfield: O/U 4.5$19.78Apr 6, 23:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Banfield: O/U 4.5$79.89Apr 6, 23:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Banfield: O/U 4.5$79.89Apr 6, 23:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Banfield: O/U 4.5$8.73Apr 6, 23:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Banfield: O/U 4.5$319.96Apr 6, 23:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Banfield: O/U 4.5$79.89Apr 6, 23:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Banfield: O/U 4.5$79.89Apr 6, 23:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Banfield: O/U 4.5$79.89Apr 6, 23:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Banfield: O/U 4.5$49.08Apr 6, 23:03 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 47
- Avg trade size
- $49.73
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 6, 22:05 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 8, 01:01 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".