Equatorial-Larva
0xbd7f15acc5bf06800bb94e0fc8efaf0097548095
Wallet digest
Activity score
49/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-477.84
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Will Ozzy Osbourne be ranked #1 globally in Google’s Year in Search 2025 Passings?
7539 shares @ 2.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 31, 2025$0.00
$-152.85
- YES
Will Gemini 3.0 be released by November 15?
2500 shares @ 9.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 31, 2025$0.00
$-225.00
- YES
Will Donald Trump be the #1 searched person on Google this year?
667 shares @ 15.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 31, 2025$0.00
$-100.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Ozzy Osbourne be ranked #1 globally in Google’s Year in Search 2025 Passings?$0.33Nov 14, 04:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ozzy Osbourne be ranked #1 globally in Google’s Year in Search 2025 Passings?$0.73Nov 14, 04:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ozzy Osbourne be ranked #1 globally in Google’s Year in Search 2025 Passings?$0.70Nov 14, 04:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ozzy Osbourne be ranked #1 globally in Google’s Year in Search 2025 Passings?$0.06Nov 14, 04:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ozzy Osbourne be ranked #1 globally in Google’s Year in Search 2025 Passings?$0.79Nov 14, 04:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ozzy Osbourne be ranked #1 globally in Google’s Year in Search 2025 Passings?$0.06Nov 14, 04:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ozzy Osbourne be ranked #1 globally in Google’s Year in Search 2025 Passings?$0.83Nov 14, 04:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ozzy Osbourne be ranked #1 globally in Google’s Year in Search 2025 Passings?$0.41Nov 14, 04:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ozzy Osbourne be ranked #1 globally in Google’s Year in Search 2025 Passings?$0.17Nov 14, 04:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ozzy Osbourne be ranked #1 globally in Google’s Year in Search 2025 Passings?$0.63Nov 14, 04:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ozzy Osbourne be ranked #1 globally in Google’s Year in Search 2025 Passings?$0.02Nov 14, 04:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ozzy Osbourne be ranked #1 globally in Google’s Year in Search 2025 Passings?$1.82Nov 14, 04:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ozzy Osbourne be ranked #1 globally in Google’s Year in Search 2025 Passings?$1.28Nov 14, 04:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ozzy Osbourne be ranked #1 globally in Google’s Year in Search 2025 Passings?$31.75Nov 12, 20:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ozzy Osbourne be ranked #1 globally in Google’s Year in Search 2025 Passings?$2.23Nov 12, 11:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ozzy Osbourne be ranked #1 globally in Google’s Year in Search 2025 Passings?$3.06Nov 12, 11:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ozzy Osbourne be ranked #1 globally in Google’s Year in Search 2025 Passings?$2.38Nov 11, 15:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ozzy Osbourne be ranked #1 globally in Google’s Year in Search 2025 Passings?$2.13Nov 11, 15:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ozzy Osbourne be ranked #1 globally in Google’s Year in Search 2025 Passings?$1.05Nov 11, 09:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ozzy Osbourne be ranked #1 globally in Google’s Year in Search 2025 Passings?$1.85Nov 11, 04:36 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 25
- Avg trade size
- $19.12
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 4, 06:07 UTC
- Last active
- Nov 14, 04:57 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".