Unimportant-Date
0xbef9dbd28c877e0aa752c577e598ebbce757185f
Wallet digest
Activity score
54/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
7
Open notional
$1.88
Total PnL
$-9.22
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC vs. Beijing Guoan FC: Both Teams to Score
2 shares @ 57.0¢·now 54.5¢·exp May 30, 2026$0.96
$-0.04
- YES
Paris Saint-Germain FC vs. Arsenal FC: Both Teams to Score
2 shares @ 56.0¢·now 51.5¢·exp May 30, 2026$0.92
$-0.08
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 5, 6:00PM-6:15PM ET
5 shares @ 77.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 5, 2026$0.00
$-3.85
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 5, 5:15PM-5:30PM ET
5 shares @ 45.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 5, 2026$0.00
$-2.25
- YES
SC Freiburg vs. Aston Villa FC: Both Teams to Score
2 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC vs. Yunnan Yukun FC: Both Teams to Score
2 shares @ 58.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Zhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Liaoning Tieren FC: Both Teams to Score
2 shares @ 64.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 24, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMLiaoning Tieren FC vs. Shanghai Haigang FC: Both Teams to Score$1.56May 29, 15:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYParis Saint-Germain FC vs. Arsenal FC: Both Teams to Score$1.01May 25, 16:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYChongqing Tonglianglong FC vs. Beijing Guoan FC: Both Teams to Score$1.01May 25, 16:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYLiaoning Tieren FC vs. Shanghai Haigang FC: Both Teams to Score$1.01May 25, 16:26 UTC
- REDEEMShandong Taishan FC vs. Wuhan San Zhen FC: Both Teams to Score$1.82May 24, 17:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYShandong Taishan FC vs. Wuhan San Zhen FC: Both Teams to Score$1.01May 23, 18:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYZhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Liaoning Tieren FC: Both Teams to Score$1.01May 23, 18:35 UTC
- REDEEMBeijing Guoan FC vs. Henan FC: Both Teams to Score$1.64May 23, 17:33 UTC
- REDEEMShanghai Haigang FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: Both Teams to Score$2.27May 23, 17:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYBeijing Guoan FC vs. Henan FC: Both Teams to Score$1.01May 23, 11:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYShanghai Haigang FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: Both Teams to Score$1.02May 23, 11:21 UTC
- REDEEMZhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC: Both Teams to Score$1.54May 20, 16:07 UTC
- REDEEMChelsea FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: Both Teams to Score$1.61May 19, 22:31 UTC
- REDEEMQingdao Xihaian FC vs. Beijing Guoan FC: Both Teams to Score$1.72May 19, 17:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYChongqing Tonglianglong FC vs. Yunnan Yukun FC: Both Teams to Score$1.01May 18, 21:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYZhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC: Both Teams to Score$1.01May 18, 21:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYSC Freiburg vs. Aston Villa FC: Both Teams to Score$1.02May 18, 21:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: Both Teams to Score$1.01May 18, 21:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYQingdao Xihaian FC vs. Beijing Guoan FC: Both Teams to Score$1.01May 18, 21:33 UTC
- REDEEMAston Villa FC vs. Liverpool FC: Both Teams to Score$1.52May 16, 14:21 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 24
- Avg trade size
- $1.15
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 5, 20:03 UTC
- Last active
- May 29, 15:37 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".