Shameful-Turmeric
0xc0bce571d924bb340161332bf9d1b61a82f00a94
Wallet digest
Activity score
79/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$100.00
Total PnL
$0.19
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Solana dip to $185 in September?$9.99Oct 1, 00:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $3800 in September?$9.98Oct 1, 00:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $120K in September?$79.84Oct 1, 00:07 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin reach $150K in September?$269.82Oct 1, 00:04 UTC
- REDEEMWill the price of Ethereum be above $4,200 on September 30?$1.8KOct 1, 00:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Ethereum be above $4,200 on September 30?$732.62Sep 30, 15:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Ethereum be above $4,200 on September 30?$1000.00Sep 30, 15:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $150K in September?$269.82Sep 30, 15:37 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 7
- Avg trade size
- $338.87
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Sep 30, 15:37 UTC
- Last active
- Oct 1, 00:08 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".