Trusting-Airship
0xc0fba4f5558950d4998ec100b8c6788fac6cec4f
Wallet digest
Activity score
34/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
200
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-9.0K
Realised
$-21.39
Win rate
11%
9 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 200- YES
Will the US next strike Iran during the week of March 1-7, 2026 (ET)?
10000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- YES
Will Poland win on 2026-03-31?
684 shares @ 19.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 31, 2026$0.00
$-134.67
- YES
Will Arsenal FC win on 2026-04-04?
541 shares @ 40.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$0.00
$-219.00
- SPURS
Spread: Spurs (-2.5)
509 shares @ 43.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$0.00
$-220.64
- OVER
Timberwolves vs. 76ers: O/U 234.5
504 shares @ 42.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 3, 2026$0.00
$-212.62
- RAPTORS
Raptors vs. Pistons
407 shares @ 41.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 1, 2026$0.00
$-166.99
- YES
Will Olympique Lyonnais win on 2026-04-05?
385 shares @ 52.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 5, 2026$0.00
$-200.00
- YES
Will Aston Villa FC win on 2026-04-25?
362 shares @ 20.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 25, 2026$0.00
$-75.17
- YES
Will Denmark win on 2026-03-31?
321 shares @ 46.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 31, 2026$0.00
$-147.57
- YES
Manchester City FC vs. Liverpool FC: Both Teams to Score
313 shares @ 64.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$0.00
$-200.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMSpread: Spurs (-6.5)$100.00May 31, 06:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Spurs (-6.5)$28.60May 30, 19:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal win the 2025–26 Champions League?$53.78May 30, 18:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYParis Saint-Germain FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 3.5$17.42May 30, 17:33 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Paris Saint-Germain FC vs. Arsenal FC end in a draw?$39.45May 30, 17:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Paris Saint-Germain FC vs. Arsenal FC end in a draw?$25.45May 30, 17:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Paris Saint-Germain FC vs. Arsenal FC end in a draw?$8.97May 30, 17:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Paris Saint-Germain FC 2 - 2 Arsenal FC?$7.20May 29, 18:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill RC Celta de Vigo win on 2026-05-17?$15.27May 17, 18:29 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Athletic Club win on 2026-05-17?$14.91May 17, 18:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Athletic Club win on 2026-05-17?$17.32May 17, 18:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Maccabi Tel Aviv FC win on 2026-05-16?$19.36May 16, 18:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Chelsea FC win on 2026-05-16?$3.09May 16, 15:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Chelsea FC win on 2026-05-16?$11.27May 16, 15:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - May 14, 7:15PM-7:20PM ET$102.99May 14, 23:17 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Girona FC vs. Real Sociedad de Fútbol end in a draw?$97.94May 14, 19:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Girona FC vs. Real Sociedad de Fútbol end in a draw?$31.64May 14, 19:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester City FC vs. Crystal Palace FC: Both Teams to Score$30.66May 13, 20:21 UTC
- TRADESELLDeportivo Alavés vs. FC Barcelona: O/U 3.5$25.42May 13, 19:54 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Deportivo Alavés win on 2026-05-13?$23.45May 13, 19:54 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 44
- Avg trade size
- $38.85
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 8, 13:41 UTC
- Last active
- May 31, 06:26 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 9 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".