Grouchy-Shower
0xc1a0fbc502d094eea67ae53dee9855cf0c5c92f9
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
10
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-8.8K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- NO
Will Manchester United win on 2025-12-08?
5984 shares @ 39.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 8, 2025$0.00
$-2.3K
- YES
Will Real Madrid CF win on 2025-12-10?
4598 shares @ 31.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 10, 2025$0.00
$-1.4K
- OVER
Brighton vs. West Ham: O/U 2.5
4235 shares @ 27.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 7, 2025$0.00
$-1.1K
- ARSENAL FC
Spread: Arsenal FC (-2.5)
4200 shares @ 6.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 29, 2026$0.00
$-252.00
- UNDER
FC Bayern München vs. 1. FC Heidenheim 1846: O/U 2.5
3857 shares @ 19.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-751.32
- YES
Will Qarabağ Ağdam FK win on 2025-12-10?
3167 shares @ 45.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 10, 2025$0.00
$-1.4K
- KINGS
Kings vs. Pacers
2495 shares @ 36.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 9, 2025$0.00
$-898.11
- UNDER
FC Bayern München vs. 1. FC Heidenheim 1846: O/U 3.5
1968 shares @ 7.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-137.51
- YES
Will Elche CF vs. Girona end in a draw?
1695 shares @ 25.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 7, 2025$0.00
$-423.78
- NO
Udinese Calcio vs. Genoa CFC: Both Teams to Score
6 shares @ 56.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 8, 2025$0.00
$-3.18
Recent activity
- MAKER_REBATE$2.21May 3, 00:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Bayern München vs. 1. FC Heidenheim 1846: O/U 3.5$3.96May 2, 14:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Bayern München vs. 1. FC Heidenheim 1846: O/U 3.5$0.32May 2, 14:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Bayern München vs. 1. FC Heidenheim 1846: O/U 3.5$0.73May 2, 14:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Bayern München vs. 1. FC Heidenheim 1846: O/U 3.5$1.88May 2, 14:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Bayern München vs. 1. FC Heidenheim 1846: O/U 3.5$3.76May 2, 14:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Bayern München vs. 1. FC Heidenheim 1846: O/U 3.5$3.76May 2, 14:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Bayern München vs. 1. FC Heidenheim 1846: O/U 3.5$0.35May 2, 14:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Bayern München vs. 1. FC Heidenheim 1846: O/U 3.5$5.29May 2, 14:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Bayern München vs. 1. FC Heidenheim 1846: O/U 3.5$0.22May 2, 14:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Bayern München vs. 1. FC Heidenheim 1846: O/U 3.5$1.88May 2, 14:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Bayern München vs. 1. FC Heidenheim 1846: O/U 3.5$3.76May 2, 14:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Bayern München vs. 1. FC Heidenheim 1846: O/U 3.5$3.76May 2, 14:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Bayern München vs. 1. FC Heidenheim 1846: O/U 3.5$44.10May 2, 14:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Bayern München vs. 1. FC Heidenheim 1846: O/U 3.5$1.88May 2, 14:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Bayern München vs. 1. FC Heidenheim 1846: O/U 3.5$5.30May 2, 14:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Bayern München vs. 1. FC Heidenheim 1846: O/U 3.5$3.76May 2, 14:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Bayern München vs. 1. FC Heidenheim 1846: O/U 3.5$3.76May 2, 14:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Bayern München vs. 1. FC Heidenheim 1846: O/U 3.5$1.88May 2, 14:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Bayern München vs. 1. FC Heidenheim 1846: O/U 3.5$47.34May 2, 14:41 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 48
- Avg trade size
- $14.87
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 2, 10:41 UTC
- Last active
- May 3, 00:45 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".