Altruistic-Moai
0xc3bdfa81117054da1c5ba99d053ae05755bb789a
Wallet digest
Activity score
44/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-4.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- REDEEMToledo vs. Louisville$37.04Dec 24, 15:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYToledo vs. Louisville$30.00Dec 23, 19:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill South Africa win on 2025-12-22?$3.00Dec 22, 19:13 UTC
- TRADESELLWill South Africa win on 2025-12-22?$53.70Dec 22, 19:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill South Africa win on 2025-12-22?$48.92Dec 22, 18:53 UTC
- REDEEMWill Trump pardon Changpeng Zhao in 2025?$48.91Nov 2, 17:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Trump pardon Changpeng Zhao in 2025?$22.99Oct 15, 14:02 UTC
- REDEEMWill Ethereum reach $3500 in May?$0.00Jun 3, 14:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum reach $4000 in May?$1.00May 18, 20:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum reach $3500 in May?$1.00May 18, 20:46 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 7
- Avg trade size
- $22.94
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 18, 20:46 UTC
- Last active
- Dec 24, 15:15 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".